Talk:Evolution on Gardiner

Issues with this article
I have tagged this article with multiple issues, mostly because as much as I hate to say it, it doesn't establish notability in it's current form. Also much of the information is out of date, or written before the building was finished. It is also written in a promotional tone. I understand that this is the tallest building in Darwin, but that alone does not mean it should have a stand-alone article. WP:GNG requires significant coverage in secondary sources - at present two of the three references are dead links, and the third, to Emporis only proves the building exists, not why it is significant.

In its current form, the article would not survive a AfD debate - I am working on improving it, but I am having difficulty finding independent sources which establish notability which are not promotional. Dfadden (talk) 07:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)