Talk:Ex-Muslims of North America

Twitter
Line 50 The 8th citation regarding twitter theocracy contains a list of organizations that signed on. The cited article doesn't directly mention the number but the list can be counted to get the number.

http://iheu.org/twittertheocracy-campaign-after-social-network-blocks-blasphemy-in-pakistan/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exmoose (talk • contribs) 15:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Poor quality article--seems to be just written by organization to promote itself
Poor quality article--seems to be just written by organization to promote itself. --Pengortm (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Merge?
It appears that the reported activities of EXMNA are mostly about the activities of its founding, Sarah Haider. It's not clear that there is enough here for a stand alone article on EXMNA. Perhaps this article should be merged into Sarah Haider. Most of the info is already there. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


 * A lot has happened since you posed this question. I believe EXMNA's activities such as going on an international tour on college campuses throughout the U.S. and Canada, as well as their campaign against the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority that actually affected change are examples of notability and why they stand alone. Sarah Haider's page has also grown to stand alone as she has done several speaking engagements separate from her organization. Seeing as she is a public speaker AND an activist, her actions separate from her organization are alos examples of notability and why she stands alone. I don't believe a merge is necessary. Daxri 05:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Requesting article expansion help
Hi,

Recently initiated Draft:Yasmine Mohammed as stub article. Pl. do have a look at the article and if interests you then join in expanding the same with suitable references.

Thanks and regards.

Bookku (talk) 10:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

addition of Wikiislam's own take
@Snuish2 It is written on top of the page that

LiuWu87 (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Why are you even citing a mirror on github? Keep in mind that any material from WikiIslam may not violate WP:SELFSOURCE. Snuish (talk) 20:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Why not? the site says it’s migrating, and that is a snapshot of how the about page of the site look in 2015. Which part of WP:Selfsource that you think is being violated? LiuWu87 (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This mirror is of unknown integrity. Why wouldn't you consider archive.org or the page from WikiIslam's own domain? Regardless, the content violates WP:EXCEPTIONAL and the first prong of WP:SELFSOURCE. Snuish (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)