Talk:Ex illis

Recovered Dead Link
I found the dead review link in the wayback machine. I was going to read them and add them as references, but someone else seems to be editing the page. https://web.archive.org/web/20101114074228/http://www.tabletopbattlefield.com/ExIllis_Review Slimy asparagus (talk) 17:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi That was me. Go for it. I'll stay clear. —¿philoserf? (talk) 17:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I am happy to let you work on it. It's not high on my list.Slimy asparagus (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: Okay I have read the reviews. I guess it passes the notability test but not entirely in a good way. Now to adopt a neutral point of view. The archived review has some positive updates though. Slimy asparagus (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Reception section
Okay I tried sandboxing a new reception section: User:Slimy_asparagus/sandbox. As I said above the dead link should be easily recoverable. I am not terribly happy with my prose. But still I thought it was a start. And I think those links could be useful. When I tried copying it over to the main article I got a big warning. So if someone could have a look. What I was adding was certainly not "non-controversial" as both sources are very critical of the product. But they do largely agree on the specifics.Slimy asparagus (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)