Talk:Excess mortality in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin/Archive 1

Table
- you have removed a table which listed all the various people whose deaths Stalin may have been responsible for. Can you please clarify why you did this? It wasn't clear to me from reading your edit summary. In particular I'm not sure what you meant by describing the estimates as "highly disputed". So far no-one has disputed any of these estimates. Or was the issue just that the numbers did not have citations next to them? If that is what the problem is, I can work on changing that. This article is pretty unintelligible to me but I think it is an important subject for people to have a clear understanding of. Woscafrench (talk, contribs) 17:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Bringing table here:


 * As you can see, some of these don't even come with citations. 12 million for the "Holodomor"? Not quite. No citation either. A nice and neat 1 million for German civilians and POWs? No source for that. And outrageously high estimates regarding Gulags and "Dekulakization" which do not hold up to contemporary academic scrutiny. So yes, these are controversial figures, and very high figures given the scope of contemporary scholarship on Soviet repression. For this reason I removed the table and suggested that any such data for a table should be discussed on talk before being reinserted into the article. Every single estimate will definitely need a WP:RS, in particular from an academic publisher and not something from the Cold War era before archival data became available. As the table exists now, it is absolutely unacceptable.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 17:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Some of the data presented in the table are not even backed by the citations included (see Verifiability)! For example, nowhere on page xvi of the 40th anniversary edition of The Great Terror does Conquest state that 10 million died in the Gulags; he says that he believes the range of victims of the Soviet regimes terrors (presumably this includes the entire period of the existence of the USSR, not just Stalin's reign) "can hardly be lower than some 15 million" (which is of course lower than his previous estimate of 20 million for the Stalinist period alone).--C.J. Griffin (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Originally, none of the figures came with citations, they were just the numbers reported by this article and also the Holodomor and Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush articles. The 12 million figure for the Holodomor is the high extreme reported in the lead of the Holodomor article. The low extreme of 1.8 million is also included. Is there a range of figures you think is more sensible? The 1 million figure for German civilians and POWs is the number given by Vadim Erlikman in the text of the article. If some of these numbers are wrong, you are more than welcome to correct them, that is how wikipedia is supposed to work. Woscafrench (talk, contribs) 18:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * My understanding is the way Wikipedia is supposed to work is that any data added must be backed by a citation to a reliable source, otherwise it constitutes WP:OR. I have been an editor on Wikipedia for over 10 years now and never have I added materials without some kind of citation to back them up. Simply ripping materials from another Wikipedia page because they happen to be there for use in some table on another page is not what I would consider to be a proper way to contribute to the encyclopedia, ESPECIALLY if what is ripped from other pages does not include proper citations! What this tells me is that there is some work that needs to be done on those other pages to correct any WP:OR issues.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Gulag - 12 mln
Another 12 million Soviet citizens died in a network of forced labor camps collectively know by the Russian acronym Gulag, may of them from the physical toil of satisfying Stalins’s relentless drive to rapidly industralize the Soviet Union.- Heidenrich, John G, How to Prevent Genocide: A Guide for Policymakers, Scholars, and the Concerned Citizen,  Westport, Conn. : Praeger, Hardcover, 2001, Page 7

Narodziny i Upadek Rewolucji Komunistyczne CarrollWarren H, Wektory, 2008|, 78-83-60562-27-7, =Sadków|pages=278 |quote=W tej sytuacji niewielu było dane przeżyć dziesięć lat w obozach (...) Łączna suma 12 milionów ofiar to prawie dokładnie dwa razy tyle, ile zginęło w żydowskim holokauście...}}

I gave the 2nd source after the collapse of the USSR, C.J. Griffin again censors what he does not like — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erni120 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

referencing problems
, your recent edits to this article have introduced numerous referencing problems ... most notably, duplicate reference definitions and references with previous undefined names. Do you need help in cleaning them up? -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * He is a blocked sock. All of his edits should be reverted.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 16:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Persistent unconstructive editing
I think the article might need semi-protected. It's being hit again by an WP:SPA who is engaging in disruptive editing.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 02:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Stalin killed 20 million innocent people
Stalin killed 20 million innocent people before the war no question about it here is the proof. Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin - The ... https://www.nytimes.com/.../major-soviet-paper-says-20-million-died-as-victims-of-stali... Feb 4, 1989 - Under a headline proclaiming The Number of Victims of Stalinism Is About 40 Million People, in a terse, question-and answer format, Mr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.197.53 (talk) 06:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I was tempted to remove this as WP:SOAP, however the IP who left this garbled message was actually pointing to this article in the New York Times. Given the calibre of the reporter (Bill Keller), I wouldn't consider the report to be insignificant, but I am on the fence as to whether it is significant enough to include as a reference in body of the article. For now, I'm just leaving this missive in order to qualify the substance of the comment. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Page move
I've just renamed the page, because the original title was totally incorrect and misleading. The article does not discuss all deaths, it discusses only excess deaths, or excess mortality. Just look at the sources this article cites.--Paul Siebert (talk) 22:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Updating the historians number and for Simon sebag adding contacts to it
Jack90s15 (talk) 22:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)When looking over the article it seems like most historians who have looked at the archival data say the death toll is at least 15 million. it says that Robert Conquest revised his number to 15 million for the entire Soviet Union era. in 2004 Simon sebag was asked on C-Span you said Stalin may have killed 30 million people. and he said yes but now we know with all the archival data. and the other references on this page it's much less than that. and just because it's lesser than we thought doesn't mean he's any less evil than he was before https://www.c-span.org/video/?182346-2/stalin-court-red-tsar-part-2


 * I think we need to separate three quite different things: (i) Cold war era estimates of the excess mortality in the USSR; under "Cold war era" I mean not only the sources that was written before the "archival revolution", but although those authors who published their books/articles later, but who refused to reconsider their estimates in light of new evidences (Rummel is one example); (ii) excess mortality vs mass killing victims; "excess mortality" is a much broader category, it included the deaths that occurred as a result of war, famine, or disease; (iii) the deaths Stalin should be blamed in; this category is a matter of political views of each concrete author. Thus, some people believe Stalin was responsible for WWII, and that, therefore, he bears a responsibility of civilian deaths in the USSR during the WWII. However, that opinion is not mainstream.--Paul Siebert (talk) 22:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

adding contacts to when the article for Timothy D. Snyder when it was posted the year
Jack90s15 (talk) 22:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC) Timothy D. Snyder said the Nazi regime killed approximately 11 million non-combatants (which rises to above 12 million if "foreseeable deaths from deportation, hunger, and sentences in concentration camps are included.

but the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in 2018 has the number for people killed during the holocaust time period at 17 million https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/documenting-numbers-of-victims-of-the-holocaust-and-nazi-persecution I am just adding when it was poseted the year

Population transfer in the Soviet Union
You missed the deportation of the various nationalities from 1940-53, Poles, Baltics, Soviet Germans and people from the Caucasus--Woogie10w (talk) 12:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Many historians have suggested that Stalin was responsible for death total of around 9 million,
Many historians are Weasel words instead, we should provide a list historians with the range of their estimates. --Woogie10w (talk) 13:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)we do at the start of the article Before the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, researchers who attempted to count the number of people killed during the period of Stalin produced estimates ranging from 2 to 60 million

Some claim the death toll could be 20 to 30 million. Those

historians working after the

Soviet Union's dissolution

have estimated victim totals

ranging from approximately

3 million to nearly 9 million

and the Total number of victims has the list of historians with the range of their estimates


 * Jack, please let's discuss RS --Woogie10w (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Historian Timothy D. Snyder, after assessing 20 years of historical research in Eastern European archives, asserts that while the Nazi regime killed approximately 10.4 million non-combatants (which rises to above 12 million if "foreseeable deaths from deportation, hunger, and sentences in concentration camps are included"), Stalin's deliberately killed about 4 million, including 3.2 million in the 1933 famine in the Ukraine (rising to 9 million if foreseeable deaths arising from policies are taken into account)[50][9] The geographic area covered by the Snyder study is limited to Poland, Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic states and western Russian regions occupied by Germany

Russian writer Vadim Erlikman, makes the following estimates: executions, 1.5 million; gulags, 5 million; deportations, 1.7 million out of 7.5 million deported; and POWs and German civilians, 1 million – a total of about 9 million victims of repression

Many historians have suggested that Stalin was responsible for death total of around 9 million, citing much higher victim totals from executions, Gulag camps, deportations and other causes

Simon Sebag Montefiore in 2004 suggested that Stalin was ultimately responsible for the deaths of between 20 and 25 million people

in his most recent edition of The Great Terror (2007), Conquest states that while exact numbers may never be known with complete certainty, at least 15 million people were killed "by the whole range of Soviet regime's terrors"

Rudolph Rummel maintains that the earlier higher victim total estimates are correct, although he includes those killed by the government of the Soviet Union in other Eastern European countries as well.

Conversely, J. Arch Getty, Stephen G. Wheatcroft and others insist that the opening of the Soviet archives has vindicated the lower estimates put forth by "revisionist" scholars

so it does give a good list of how we have come to a accurate range for the death toll

and just because its lower then we thought doesn't mean Stalin is any less evil then he was before

Snyder misrepresented
I own the Bloodlands, the article misrepresented Snyder. I corrected these mistakes. I will send jpgs of the pages in Bloodlands if necessary. Snyder is a living person, Wikipedia has to present him correctly.--Woogie10w (talk) 13:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You are mistaken, and should take a closer look at the quote provided in the 2011 Snyder citation. Your edits on this have already been reverted by another editor.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 03:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Simon Sebag Montefiore
Why do we have Simon Sebag Montefiore as a source? I see no academic background,he appears to be a journalist. Anyway I see support for his numbers--Woogie10w (talk) 02:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I think we should revise all sources, because many of them just reproduce (sometimes, not accurately) the data from a handful of good research; as a result, a wrong impression is created that many independent research have been made on that subject. Instead of citing various journalists and blogs who cite, e.g. Conquest or Wheatcroft, it is better to cite them directly. In addition, obsolete sources, or the authors who use only obsolete data should not be used, probably, just mentioned in the section devoted to a history of the subject.--Paul Siebert (talk) 02:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Vadim Erlikman has been misrepresented
The article says Russian writer Vadim Erlikman, makes the following estimates: executions, 1.5 million; gulags, 5 million; deportations, 1.7 million out of 7.5 million deported; and POWs and German civilians, 1 million – a total of about 9 million victims of repression.

I own the Erlikman book. What you have in the article is not correct, the source has been misrepresented. This is what actually appears in Erlikman's book From 1928-53 there were, executions, 1.350 million; gulags, 5.050 million; deportations,  1.750 million out of 7.5 million deported; 7.000 million in famine of 1933 and 750,000 POWs and German civilians 800,000 – a total of about 16.670 million victims of repression. If you want to see the actual source I will send jpgs by E mail''--Woogie10w (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * This book (in Russian) is available online, and my google translator says this paragraph looks like this:
 * "The prison population of the Gulag grew rapidly: in 1937 it was (in camps, colonies and labor settlements) 2,658,156 people, in 1939 - already 2,961,528 people.41. It should be repeated that these figures meant only an approximate number of prisoners on January 1 of each year. Meanwhile, mortality in some northern camps reached 300% per year; according to V.V. Tsaplina, in 1939 alone, 525 thousand prisoners died42. At the same time, according to GULAG statistics, given by V.N. Zemskovoy, in 1934 - 53 years. a total of about 1.7 million prisoners died43. According to his own data, only in 1941 - 45 years. in the camps and colonies, more than 1 million prisoners died44. The NKVD leadership itself did not know the exact number of prisoners; it is known that it requested 4 million forms for the 1939 census, of which 2 million then returned 45 - an indirect confirmation of the fact that these 2 million had disappeared by then in the depths of the repressive system. YES. Volkogonov, who had full access to the archives, believed that in 1937 - 39 years. from 4.5 to 5.5 million people were repressed, of which 800 - 900 thousand were shot46. Apparently, these data are close to real. Thus, in just 1923 - 53 years. Gulag passed at least 30 million people., of which at least 5.5 million died."


 * What seems odd here is the figure of 30 million passed through Gulag, because even Conquest, who, according to Erlikhman, provides exaggerated figures, concedes that, according to new data, the number of people passed through Gulag (including labor colonies) was about 18 million.
 * However, the most puzzling is the number of 5.5 million died in Gulag. I failed to understand the source of this figure. It seems Erlikhman obtained it by adding official data, other estimates for separate years and his own estimates of unaccounted deaths, which he calculated judging by the number of forms for the 1939 census. That means this is a very indirect estimate that contradicts to all mainstream sources. In addition, taking into account that major organizers of the 1937 census were repressed (because Stalin was not satisfied with its results), it is not a big surprise that those who organized the 1939 (fake) census, were somewhat disoriented, and they tried to protect themselves from possible problems. Maybe, that is an explanation why the number of forms was higher. I may be wrong, but I cannot understand what the figure of 5.5 was obtained from.--Paul Siebert (talk) 16:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Paul you cite figures from Erlikman's introduction on page 12 that cover 1923-53, 5.5 million. I took my data from pages 19-22 that add down to 5.050 million. I see your point,good catch. I have put all of Erlikmans data on a spreadsheet. There are a number of cases where his details do not agree with his cited total! The guy is not an accountant!--Woogie10w (talk) 16:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I tried, but I still don't understand where the figure of 5,050 comes from. Was it obtained by Erlikhman, or you calculated it by yourself? In the latter case, it is an original research (if I understand our policy correct).--Paul Siebert (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * From pages 19-22 заключено в тюръмы и лагеря -Confined in prisons or camps 1923-34 1,000,000; 1935-41 2,500,000; 1941-45 1,200,000; 1946-53 350,000 = 5,050,0000 That is not OR--Woogie10w (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I think, you misread it. He could not write "взято в плен- из них погибло" about 1923-34 events, because that means literally "POWs died in captivity", but there were no hostilities during that time. He writes "sent to prisons and camps - 10,500, died in captivity - 1,000" However, I don't see any source he is citing. Gulag did not exist in 1920s, and it seems the figure of 10,500 refers mostly to deported peasants during collectivisation. In any event, I don't think this book is too reliable source, because it mixes really reliable data with author's own estimates taken out of thin air.
 * Regarding OR, if you take some figures, even from a single source, add them and obtains a sum, this seems to be an original research. Ask at the NOR noticeboard if you don't agree. --Paul Siebert (talk) 20:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * That is not OR please see-No original research--Woogie10w (talk) 21:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * This is a real problem on Wikipedia, too many editors cite a single solitary statistic from a source without attempting to determine its content. We need to start understanding why there is is a range of numbers, instead of citing Prof. Snodgrass says the number is XXX,000. We should bore down and find out the components of the Snodgrass figure. What is Snodgrass including in his figure, what has been ommitted? We analyze text, we should analyze numerical data. No OR,just tell readers what is in the number.--Woogie10w (talk) 21:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Paul you wrote, I cannot understand what the figure of 5.5 was obtained from Millions were impressed into the projects in the 1930's. Demographic evidence indicates the higher death toll, these people were not necessarily convicts. Anyway the Kurman memo indicates that deaths were underestimated. IMO the project managers continued to collect rations for dead souls--Woogie10w (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Demographic evidences are indirect, and they do not tell how concretely all those people had died. In addition, when demographic figures are discussed, one has to take into account an overall consequences of Stalin's rule, and his rule lead to a dramatic growth of excess lives (the term proposed by Michael Ellman: there was a rapid growth of life expectancy in Russia, it started in 1890s and ended in 1960s, and what the deaths that were considered as "excess deaths" in 40s could fit into a natural mortality category in 1910s.--Paul Siebert (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The scope of the repression has been the subject of discussion by demographic experts in Russia, see Demoscope 313-314 from 2007. The statistics of repression is complicated topic that has received superficial coverage in English langauge sources. --Woogie10w (talk) 17:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The problem with Russian sources is that many of them are biased, and it is not easy to separate reliable sources by formal criteria.--Paul Siebert (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The problem with Western as well as Russian sources is that many of them are biased, and it is not easy to separate reliable sources by formal criteria. Take R. J. Rummel for example, I bet nobody bothered on Wikipedia to understand his methodology, as for the Russian repression data 99.9% of the editors on Wikipedia cannot explain the details of thr figures released in the 1990's and then tie that data into the ADK figures. Hello the coffee is ready, the ADK crew was working for the Russian government. The academic idiots in the west swollowed the ADK story hook line and sinker. The 23 year old guy who was pulled off his fathers Russian farm in 1936 and sent to a remote project labor camp in Siberia, the poor soul died of typhoid fever in 1938. He was a "natural death" for ADK. IMO Erlikman treats these people as prisoners. See John Scott (writer), also Frank Lormier points out that 20 million persons were moved to the east in the 1928-39 period. I can't post this commentary to Wikipedia, but we can cite Erlikmans data.--Woogie10w (talk) 22:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Reagarding reliable sources and OR there is a problem I have encountered on Wikipedia. Reliable Source A says the number is 4 million and reliable source B says it is 9 million. Some Wikipedians engage in a pissing contest to discredit one source to prove that it is not really reliable, they spend hours at the RSN and ANI in order to prove that either A or B is correct. What should be done is we post A and B and move on with our lives!--Woogie10w (talk) 23:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm wondering why Erlikman is cited in the first place. Is he a notable source? Is he a serious scholar or historian of the era? I can't find much about him online, except some postings on message boards describing him as an author or journalist. According to the text, he's a "Russian writer." Should his estimates be given the same weight as those of Wheatcroft, Getty, Ellman and Snyder, all notable scholars on the subject who have either done the archival research themselves (Wheatcroft and Getty) or analyzed data published by archival researchers (Ellman and Snyder)? Secondly, given that the source is in Russian and this is the English Wikipedia, WP:Verifiability is an issue, as evidenced by this very thread.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Erlikman has a degree in history and a Phd in Russia, his speciality is childrens liturature. His handbook of human losses in the 20th centuary is of interest to users in the west because he cites data from Russian and Soviet sources that is unknown in the west. I would compare him to Matthew White who has done similar work using English language sources. With this said, I agree that Erlikman lacks notability. In any case readers need to know that there are a range of reliable sources on Stalinist repression that range from 9 to 20 million. It is not our job as editors to pass judgement on the validity of the figures, high or low. Bear in mind that the lower range of about 9-10 million includes about 6-7 million famine and 2-3 million Gulag/execution deaths. The higher range of 15-22 million excess deaths is based on an hypothetical demographic estimate of excess deaths, Rosefielde is an example. The ADK demographic team in Russia that computed the official war dead figure of 27 million believe that there were an additional 11 million excess deaths, 7.2 million in the 1933 famine, 3 million repression deaths and 1 million in 1947 famine. This is quite close to most English language sources cited here with the exception of Conquest and Rosefielde. --Woogie10w (talk) 02:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)


 * From my experience, all good Russian authors either have articles published in Western peer-reviewed journals, or their books have been cited by Western peers. As a rule, if some author is not known in the West, this author is not reliable. Good Russian historians do not work in isolation from the West.--Paul Siebert (talk) 02:22, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * But it is our job as editors to judge the reliability of sources. I would hardly consider a pseudo-historian and self-proclaimed "atrocitologist" like M. White to be a reliable source. His work should in no way be given the same weight as the aforementioned scholars and others. If Erlikman is merely another M. White, I would say my initial concerns have been confirmed. I'm not sure if Erlikman should be kept as a source given this, along with the verifiability issue I mentioned prior. Needless to say, there are other sources in the article which give higher figures and are considered to be reliable by Wikipedia's standards (e.g., A. Yakovlev 2004, even though I personally disagree with his sweeping conclusions and ridiculous estimates which are based largely on his own intuition and not verifiable data).--C.J. Griffin (talk) 03:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree that White is not good. BTW, I noticed that some blog citing White is being used in other Wikipedia article. I suggest to remove it from all articles.--Paul Siebert (talk) 02:22, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

can't be more then 15 million deaths when using archival data and using information  what we have now
Jack90s15 (talk) 03:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)  Robert Conquest was the first person to say 20 million Deaths from Stalin before he died he said

15 million deaths for all of the USSR multiple historians

say its below 20 million such has

Historian Timothy D. Snyder, after assessing 20 years of historical research in Eastern European archives, asserts that while Stalin's deliberately killed about 6 million (rising to 9 million if foreseeable deaths arising from policies are taken into account

The Great Terror (2007), Conquest states that while exact numbers may never be known with complete certainty,

at least 15 million people were killed "by the whole range of Soviet regime's terrors"

American historian Richard Pipes noted: "Censuses revealed that between 1932 and 1939—that is, after collectivization but before World War II—the population decreased by 9 to 10 million people

Conversely, J. Arch Getty, Stephen G. Wheatcroft and others insist that the opening of the Soviet archives has vindicated the lower estimates put forth by "revisionist" scholars

and if we use what information we have such has Gulag deaths

according to estimates based on data from Soviet archives post-1991,

there were around 1.6 million deaths during the whole period from 1929 to 1953. The tentative historical consensus is that of the 18 million people who passed through the gulag system from 1930 to 1953, between 1.5 and 1.7 million died as a result of their incarceration

Soviet famine of 1932–33 deaths of 5.7 to 7 million people

in the 1932–1933 famine among the victims of repression during the period of Stalin

Judicial Executions 777,975 to 1,200,000

Soviet famine of 1946–47

The last major famine to hit the USSR began in July 1946, reached its peak in February–August 1947 and then quickly diminished in intensity, although there were still some famine deaths in 1948.[44] Economist Michael Ellman claims that the hands of the state could have fed all those who died of starvation. He argues that had the policies of the Soviet regime been different, there might have been no famine at all or a much smaller one. Ellman claims that the famine resulted in an estimated 1 to 1.5 million lives lost in addition to secondary population losses due to reduced fertility.

Deportation of kulaks

large numbers of kulaks regardless of their nationality were resettled to Siberia and Central Asia. According to data from Soviet archives, which were published in 1990, 1,803,392 people were sent to labor colonies and camps in 1930 and 1931, and 1,317,022 reached the destination. Deportations on a smaller scale continued after 1931. Data from the Soviet archives indicates 2.4 million Kulaks were deported from 1930-34 The reported number of kulaks and their relatives who had died in labour colonies from 1932 to 1940 was 389,52

Expulsion of Germans after World War II

Estimates of total deaths of German civilians in the flight and expulsions, including Forced labour of Germans in the Soviet Union, range from 500,000 to a maximum of 3.0 million people

Forced settlements in the Soviet Union 1939-53

According to the Russian historian Pavel Polian 5,870 million persons were deported to Forced settlements in the Soviet Union from 1920-1952, including 3,125 million from 1939-52. Those ethnic minorities considered a threat to Soviet security from (1939-52) were forciably deported to Special Settlements run by the NKVD. Poles, Ukrainians from western regions, Soviet Germans, Balts, Estonians peoples from the Caucasus and Crimea were the primary victims of this policy. Data from the Soviet archives list 309,521 deaths in the Special Settlements from 1941-48 and 73,454 in 1949-50. According to Polian these people were not allowed to return to their home regions until after Stalins death, the exception being Soviet Germans who were not allowed to return to the Volga region of the USSR.

Katyn massacre 22,000

if we add all the deaths from what we have have we get 15,194,492 people who where killed from Stalin's policies and just because its lower then we thought doesn't mean Stalin is any less evil then he was before I used the high estimates for Judicial Executions and  The Soviet famine of 1932-1933 and  The Gulags and the 46-47 famine and the Expulsion of Germans after World War II

Adding contacts to the some claim it could be 20-30 million and changing the death toll range since we know it's 9 to 15 million
Jack90s15 (talk) 18:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Adding contacts to the some claim it could be 20-30 million I am going to put some claim it could be 20-30 million without using archival data. And I'm going to change the death toll range since we know it's 9 to 15 million with what historian currently say it is and what we have with  information from that time period

Adding the year when Rudolph Rummel said the earlier higher estimates were correct so people know that the correct number is 9 to 15 million with archival data and population
Jack90s15 (talk) 18:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Adding the year when Rudolph Rummel said the earlier higher estimates were correct so people know that the correct number is around 9 to 15 million with archival data and population

List of hidden numbers in Total Dead section
To arrive at these figures that are not supported by archival evidence the higher school lowers the natural death rate and compares the hypothetical to the actual ending census population. The donut hole ie. the differnce becomes Stalins victims. I have done this on an Excel spreadsheet off Wiki. A few points more or less in the natural death rate can mean millions of excess deaths, also Rosefielde low balls the military casualties and comes up with 20-22 million. Bear in mind that the vital statisics of the 1940s are estimated according to ADK The question of losses is not straightforward. --Woogie10w (talk) 03:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Not Black Book, but Introduction to the Black Book. The book itself (Werth's chapter) says the number was 15 million. Courtois fabricated his figures, and that caused a very negative Werth's reaction.--Paul Siebert (talk) 05:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks Paul, anyway can we squeeze the table in?


 * I am not sure. We cannot present obsolete data along with modern ones and we cannot present reliable data along with unreliable ones. Thus, the figure presented by Courtois has been widely criticized, and we cannot present it along with much more accurate Werth's figures.
 * Yakovlev is not a professional historian at all, and he was involved in a political struggle with his opponents from CPSU, so he had a reason to provide exaggerated figures. Volkogonov is know to be highly sensitive to political demands of current leadership, so his estimates were significantly affected with a current political situation.
 * The only thing we can do is to present modern and non-controversial figures, leaving everything else beyond the scope (probably, we can move them into a footnote.


 * One more thing. Please, keep in mind that this article tells about Stalin's era. Werth, Courtois and some other authors combine the Civil war deaths and Stalin's era deaths. Many of them attribute a whole war time mortality (including White terror, KIA, victims of typhus and Spanish flu, famine) to the communist authorities. That is definitely beyond the scope of this article.--Paul Siebert (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * :We cannot present obsolete data along with modern ones. What do you mean by modern? A high school writer 22 million Rosefielde was published in 2009!--Woogie10w (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I have no objections to Rosefielde, although I think his methodology should be better explained. I am talking about Yakovlev, Rummel, Conquest, as well as the authors who non-critically compile obsolete data.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 04:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC) with archival data/population data the max is number is 15 million when adding everything we have and you are right The question of losses is not straightforward. but this article has of now gets the point to people that Stalin is responsible for millions of deaths 15 million when using archival data/population data I am going try and make this page semi protected for this article so people who want to truly contribute to this page can and so it won't get vandalized
 * I would oppose including this table, as the estimates are wildly exaggerated in most cases. In fact, it seems to me the only estimate that even comes close to post-archival research on the era is Snyder's. Brent and Montefiore are most likely basing their estimates on Conquest's outdated and very flawed works, and not archival research (no archival researchers come to 20 million killed under Stalin, sorry). Yakovlev pulls numbers out of thin air based upon his own intuition and not documentation, and was a politician and not a historian. I doubt Volkogonov is basing his 21.5 million dead on anything but pre-1991 research, and not archival data from NKVD, Gulag, etc. BboC estimate is from intro and covers the entire period of Soviet power, and has been disputed by other contributors. Rosefielde puts this as the highest estimate, most likely based on Conquest. His lower estimates are from 10 to 13 million. And Rummel, don't even get me started on that guy. This is the "scholar" who increased his "democide" totals for PRC by tens of millions based on the Chang/Halliday hatchet job "biography" Mao: the Unknown Story, which was panned by Sinologists across the board.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Rosefielde puts this as the highest estimate, most likely based on Conquest, That is wrong, it is not based on Conquest, Rosefielde based on his own calculations in Red Holocaust puts the figure at 22.048 million.  Rosefielde is a reliable academic source. On Wikipedia we have a NPOV and present both sides of the argument, I dont agree with him but we must present his argument to readers--Woogie10w (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * BTW Conquest is a reliable source, you cant deny that. He argued in academic journals that the Glasnost archival data was wrong--Woogie10w (talk) 16:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I have hard copies in my files of those tendatious arguments back in 1990's between Wheatcroft, Ellman and Conquest. I also own the Rosefielde book. --Woogie10w (talk) 16:25, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Re Rummel, he is famous because he introduced a factor analysis methodology into this field, and proposed a concept of "democratic peace". That is why he is being widely cited. With regard to his numerical estimates, no serious historians seriously believe in them. Maybe, that is the reason why he published all of that in non-peer reviewed books or even on a personal web page.


 * Rosefielde is a serious author, however, we have to clearly understand what exactly he is talking about. Thus, using the same approach, he claims there were about 4 million of excess deaths in democratic Russia in 1990s. If we will understand that literally, we must agree that the number of victims of democratic transformations in a European country in late XX century was comparable to the number of victims of such a tragedy as the Holocaust. --Paul Siebert (talk) 17:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * A point that should be covered here is why Gorbachov released the archival Gulag data. In the late 1980's there were writers in the SU that claimed losses in the Stalin era were 20-40 million. Gorbachov wanted to set the record straight and ordered the Gulag data released. My own research working with the population data in ADK indicates that the archival Gulag data is correct. The ADK data indicates a natural death rate of c.2.8% in the 1930's on the other hand Rosefielde estimated c.2.0%. A manipulation of the death rate downward will give us excess deaths. This seems to go over the heads of the academic wonks that claim 20million dead.--Woogie10w (talk) 16:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * No, that is not correct. He didn't care about that, the release of the data was a part of the bigger plan to make a society more open and to discredit his opponents from CPSU.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I also own the book, a very polemical work in fact, and it seems he's attempting to restore the earlier higher estimates in his chapter "20 million souls". But even he concedes on page 17 that the numbers were more than 13 million "and could rise above 20 million." Thirteen million seems somewhat reasonable (although describing them as "Red Holocaust" victims is polemical and unscholarly IMO, and implies all these deaths constitute a genocide on par with the Holocaust, which is simply not true as most of these deaths were not even "purposive deaths" - as Wheatcroft calls them - let alone genocide), but "rising above 20 million," the evidence for that is poor at best, and flies in the face of what other post-1991 academic research has concluded. Nevertheless, while Rosefielde is a reliable source by Wikipedia standards, that's no reason to include all the authors and their higher estimates via this lopsided table into the article. And Conquest's 2007 estimate is already included in the article. That's fine. However, Conquest's pre-1991 estimates should not be included unless it is highlighted they come from pre-archival research, IMO. And perhaps if Rosefielde's estimates are added, we should also include the 4 million dead during the 1990's during the democratic capitalist revolution that Siebert mentioned above.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 17:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * There was a long dispute among Rosefielde, Wheatcroft, Conquest, Keep, and some other authors on that subject. This dispute occurred in a form of peer-reviewed publications, and the quality of arguments was high. Later, Rosefielde published the (non-peer-reviewed) book where he presented his own arguments and essentially ignored arguments of his peers. Interestingly, I found no reviews on this book in jstor. I would propose to use Rosefielde, but not his articles, not the book.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * the democratic capitalist revolution Wow, now I understand your POV--Woogie10w (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Actually, that is not POV, almost the same wording is used by Maksudov, who is a mainstream scholar.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh please. Were they not democratic revolutions that restored capitalism to this part of the world? Nothing polemical about what I said there. In fact Rosefielde himself goes further and calls out the "Washington Consensus" for some 3.4 million deaths for Russia proper in 1990 to 1998 (clearly more ideological language than I used).--C.J. Griffin (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * OMG, Readers off Wikipedia will see that figure of 20 million in print, we need to explain to readers why there is a difference between the 20 million and the 9 million. As editors we need to know why and how Conquest and Rosefielde come up with their estimates. I doubt that you have grasped this important point--Woogie10w (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * That is correct. And that is why we need to separate a current state of the knowledge and a history of the subject. We should also explain two other things: First, this question is very ideologically charged, so the figure provided by some concrete journalist may be affected by the idea they wants to convey. Second, we need not only provided the figure, but explain what exactly does it mean. --Paul Siebert (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Steven Rosefielde Documented Homicides and Excess Deaths: New Insights into the Scale Killing in the USSR During the 1930s- Here Rosefielde explains his methodology--Woogie10w (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)introducing new demographic evidence proving that Stalin killed at least 5.2 million Soviet citizens 1927-1938, with a best estimate in the vicinity of 10 million. from what you posted New Insights into the Scale Killing in the USSR so it is 9 to 15 million deaths with what we have has of now

Jack90s15 (talk) 18:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC) tried to get semi protection for this page using the twinkie Gadget but it was denied well in the beginning of the article it says that some claime the death toll could be 20 to 30 million if we add that that's without archival data it will show people that the number is around 9 to 15 million and when you type in how many people did  Stalin kill you get the holodomor number and the picture that Google uses is from a  far-right website

Expulsion of the Germans-Speedy delition proposed
The expulsion of the Germans is generally not included with Excess mortality in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin. Lets detete it ASAP, any objections?--Woogie10w (talk) 14:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * None from me.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 15:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

ADK estimate for 1933 famine deaths
Wheatcroft and Davies claim ADK estimated 8.5 million deaths. This is the figure of Wheatcroft and Davies computed by adding up the absloute increase in the number of deaths from 1930-33 in the ADK study. In fact ADK estimated 7.0 million in their published work.--Woogie10w (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

== The U.S  state of Utah officially recognized the Holodomor in Ukraine of 1932-33 as the genocide of Ukrainian people and declared November 24 as the Day of Remembrance of the victims of this tragedy ==

at least 7.5 million in the  Holodomor

in the The U.S. state of Utah officially recognized the Holodomor in Ukraine of 1932-33 as the genocide of Ukrainian people and declared November 24 as the Day of Remembrance of the victims of this tragedy.

The corresponding declaration was signed by Governor Gary Herbert, the Embassy of Ukraine in the United States reported on Saturday.

"Utah Governor Gary Herbert signed the declaration on commemoration of the victims of the Holodomor-genocide of 1932-1933 in Ukraine and on announcement of the Day of Remembrance of Ukrainian Holodomor-genocide on November 24, 2018," reads the statement.

The signing ceremony was held as part of the meeting of Utah Governor Gary Herbert with Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States Valeriy Chaly and Honorary Consul of Ukraine to Utah Jonathan Friedman. https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-society/2558135-us-state-of-utah-recognizes-holodomor-of-193233-as-genocide-of-ukrainians.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack90s15 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)   Jack90s15 (talk) 16:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

the highest number that it can be when looking at all the numbers together and using only archival data is 10 million so I'm going to change it to 9 to 10 million
using the highest estimate for the holodomor 7.5m

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides_by_death_toll

and the 799,455 executions (1921–1953), around 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag[13][14] some 390,000 deaths during kulak forced resettlement and up to 400,000 deaths of persons deported to Forced settlements in the Soviet Union during the 1940’s  – with a total of about 3.3 million officially recorded victims

we got 10 million — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack90s15 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)   Jack90s15 (talk) 16:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Jack man yo, Wikipedia is not a source Check this out Identifying reliable sources--Woogie10w (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Cited source Synder says 9 million, but you changed it to 10 million. You can't do this on Wikipedia. Please be good and stop or you will be reported to WP:ANI--Woogie10w (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Wow Jack man, I checked out your talk page, you were blocked in the past. Follow the Wikipedia rules or you will be blocked again.--Woogie10w (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok i will do it the right way and be for will make a change to any thing i will cite sources that are not Wikipedia i did make mistakes when i started out but now i know how to do it the right way and i will Jack90s15 (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks Jack, I did the same thing back in 2005 when I was a beginner here.--Woogie10w (talk) 17:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Thank you very much for understanding as you can see I've only been editing this page to help contribute to and the other page was the deaths in the USSR during World War II

My next edit I am going to do I will provide actual sources and not Wikipedia ones thank you for understanding very much

Most people who quote Stalin usually quote the numbers that didn't have any archival research to them such as the 20 million to 60 million
Most people who quote Stalin usually quote the numbers that didn't have any archival research to them such as the 20 million to 60 million so going to rephrase it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack90s15 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)   Jack90s15 (talk) 16:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This is wildly incorrect. You seek to add the highest possible estimates such as 60 million, but not the lowest estimates put forth by so-called "revisionist" scholars which go way below 20 million? What, do you think J. Arch Getty, et al were dropped out of the sky in 1991 upon the archival revolution? His influential work "Origins of the Great Purges" (1985) offered much, MUCH lower estimates than Conquest, et al were putting forth at the time. He offered that during the time period covered in the book, "many thousands of people were arrested, imprisoned and sent to labor camps. Thousands were executed." (p.8) There are still others. For example, Wheatcroft and Conquest were going back and forth in the 1980s as well. Saying that the lowest estimate during the Cold War was 20 million is just not accurate. And no modern scholar post-1991 that I'm aware of puts forth that 60 million people were killed by Stalin, which is demographically impossible. That would have Stalin "killing" nearly as many people as the entire Second World War! Ridiculous. Solzhenitsyn postulated it could be 60 million, but as Wheatcroft (1996) points out, this was done to get the Soviets to respond by admitting that repression and killings occurred but the actual numbers were much lower than this. It was a political work, not a work of quantitative history. Aside of Solzhenitsyn, almost nobody, even during the Cold War, put forth this estimate. The other citation used to back this here is M. White's website, which is not a reliable source.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * There are two issues here to discuss, first:the information we had prior to the archival disclosures of the 1990's. The estimates made at that time are of historical interest. Two influential writers on the topic were Iosif G. Dyadkin and Anton Antonov-Ovseyenko, both used flawed population data and came to the conclusion that repression deaths were 30-40 million. Their estimates have no relevance today. second the information we have since the archival disclosures of the 1990's and the revision of the 1939 census. This can best be summed up in a 2001 article by ADK (Google translate does a nice job) Total excess deaths in the Stalin era were c.38 million(7.2 million collectivization; 3.0 million repression deaths; 27.2 million war deaths(1939-45) and 1.0 million in 1947 famine). An important point to consider is that of the war dead 18 million were killed and the balance of 9 million were indirect deaths due to a deterioration in living conditions that caused famine, disease. We need to get our facts straight. Woogie 10w 14:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This is why we base our edits on reliable sources. Jack90s15's additions that the pre-1991 range is between 20 to 60 million is not backed by any reliable sources that are cited there, therefore it qualifies as WP:OR. I can see how one might assume this range after reading Matthew White's website, but that is far from a reliable source. He omits quite a bit, including the Getty book I referred to above.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Collaboration in German-occupied Soviet Union was a reality that is ignored by official Russian sources today. They were responsible for horrible atrocities in the USSR and Poland. They were Hitlers willing executioners in the death camps. These scumbags were considered freedom fighters against communism and welcomed as refugees in the west during the cold war. After the war they were locked up or shot in the USSR--Woogie 10w 15:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I could post the Dyadkin and Anton Antonov-Ovseyenko figures but we need to have good sources to refute their estimates. BTW this is where R. J. Rummel gets his numbers.--Woogie 10w 15:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure it would be constructive to add a plethora of outdated sources just to refute them. It might overwhelm lay readers on the subject and ultimately be confusing, especially if there is a lot of cross-pollination of these sources. I'll let other editors weigh in on this.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree, but the real problem here is that we need to have an understanding of why the numbers changed. Some editors are shopping around for the lowest number and the others only want to see the highest figure. --Woogie 10w 16:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Take Rosefielde for example, he made up his own population model. For the war dead he cherry picked data computed by the communist party hack historian Schevyakov. Rosefielde is lost, I feel sorry for his students who have to regurgitate his nonsense.--Woogie 10w 16:32, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Some clam the death toll could be 20 to 30 million without using archival data The highest number is 50 million    without using archival data and hear some of my sources
Some clam the death toll could be 20 to 30 million without using archival data

The highest number is at lest 50 million without using archival data  and hear some of my sources

William Cockerham, Health and Social Change in Russia and Eastern Europe: 50M+ from stalin https://www.amazon.com/Health-Social-Change-Russia-Eastern/dp/0415920817#reader_0415920817 chapter 1 page 4 starting from chapter 1

So I will change it to at least 50 million without using archival data

And for the before 1991 ranges estimated from 2 to 60 million the sources that I provide only come up with 20 million and none of them say 2 million here are my sources

Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin The estimates, by the historian Roy Medvedev, were printed in the weekly tabloid Argumenti i Fakti, which has a circulation of more than 20 million. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/04/world/major-soviet-paper-says-20-million-died-as-victims-of-stalin.html

Robert Conquest: Revered historian and poet who was the first to catalogue the full horrors of the Stalinist purges of the 1930s Conquest's magnum opus, The Great Terror: Stalin's Purge of the Thirties, was the first to clearly show how the Soviet leader carried out mass murder Conquest himself at first put the figure at around 20 million In 1968 from his first book https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/robert-conquest-revered-historian-and-poet-who-was-the-first-to-catalogue-the-full-horrors-of-the-10441381.html

His most recent estimation was published in the 40th anniversary edition of The Great Terror, in which he writes: "Exact numbers may never be known with complete certainty, but the total deaths caused by the whole range of the Soviet regime's terrors can hardly be lower than some 13 to 15 million." Jack90s15 (talk) 18:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Your edits are becoming very disruptive. The consensus prior to the opening of the archives was around 20 million, give or take. That's what the cited sources tell us, so that's what the text should reflect. Almost no one but one or two obscure sources you found on Matthew White's webpage give an estimate of 50 million or more (And it's a good guess outrageous estimates like this largely comes from Solzhenitsyn's political books, which makes them even more problematic - this is the cross-pollination I was referring to above). There is absolutely no consensus for this estimate, so it seem to me the only reason to include it is to muddy the narrative and confuse readers. There is no need to flood the article with all these obsolete and exaggerated estimations which literally vary by the tens of millions (30 million here, 43 million there, and 50 million... 60 million, etc). So please stop just changing the numbers on a whim when they go against the sources cited in the body of the article. The way I see it, the text should say something like "prior to the collapse of the USSR and the archival revelations, many historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher" (which is backed by the sources already cited) and be done with it. Stop it with the numbers game.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Jack deserves to be heard, I believe he should take his case to WP:RSN. Jack I suggest that you follow the link to the WP:RSN, we can bring final closure to this matter. I have Rummel's Lethal Politics and Democide both published in the 1990's as well as Rosefielde's Red Holocaust. At this point we have only three editors involved in the discussion, Hi Paul. Lets get some other opinions at WP:RSN.--Woogie 10w 19:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 20:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Before we take it any farther I really like that idea it makes sense and I get what you mean

I am not trying to do a numbers game or confuse people because that makes perfect sense it shows people that before 1991 people really didn't how many people actually died

and you get various estimates like you said

So I'll change it to what you said

prior to the collapse of the USSR and the archival revelations,

many historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher

And if we all can agree on that I won't make any more changes with numbers and leave the other numbers the way they are since right now the article is really good

and explains to the reader excess

mortality under Joseph Stalin and how we got to the correct number of deaths

== I am going to change it to what CJ Griffin suggested it say for before the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, researchers who attempted to count the number of people killed during the period of Stalin produced estimates ranging from to prior to the collapse of the USSR and the archival revelations, many historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher ==

I am going to change it to what CJ Griffin recommended

I have not heard back or have gotten any replies but I will keep my word and only change it to what he recommended it say

From Before the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, researchers who attempted to count the number of people killed during the period of Stalin produced estimates ranging from

To prior to the collapse of the USSR and the archival revelations, many historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher

I want to thank both of you for helping and showing me the right way to edit and all  Jack90s15 (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem. I think this will be a constructive change.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I made some modifications myself, based on the cited sources and the estimates they give, which are all around 20 million.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 21:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

== Some historians claim that the death toll was 15-20 million based on their own demographic analysis and from dated information published before the release of the reports from the Soviet archives. before the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, researchers who attempted to count the number of people killed during the period of Stalin produced estimates ranging from 2 to 60 million ==

rudolph rummel still said in 2006 60 million people where still killed by Stalin so i am gong to change it to 15 to 60 and the top one of the page to Some claim the death toll could be 20 to 60 million without using archival data because rudolph rummel still said he killed 60 million people

http://www.distributedrepublic.net/archives/2006/05/01/how-many-did-stalin-really-murder/

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

For the top of the page it says that the range is before 1991 were from 2 to 60 million but the source that that the ranges were 20 to 60 million pre 1991

So I am going to change it to 20 to 60 million since that's what the source says that was pre 1991 http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm#Stalin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack90s15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 13 October 2018 (UTC)      Jack90s15 (talk) 18:15, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No, Rummel said that 43 million were killed by Stalin, 62 million comes from the entire period of Soviet power. And I should note that the first link posted above is a blog article, and one posted on a right-wing website I might add. Not a reliable source.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jack90s15 (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)That right-wing website is part of the sources under the total number of deaths I will use the sources with names and dates and not the blog to make my case for changing them


 * This is turning into a long winded tendentious blog, lets take the case to WP:RSN, I have Rummel's Lethal Politics on my bookshelf--Woogie 10w 19:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think that anyone would dispute that Lethal Politics qualifies as a reliable source for Wikipedia. The blog from 2006 is a different matter. The estimates in both are identical as far as I can tell, so I think it would be pertinent that if Rummel has to be cited, we stick with the book, and not the blog which takes readers to a polemical, right-wing site. Personally, I think Rummel's 1990 book is only useful in any discussion/study of the historiography of Soviet repression, given it is very outdated and there is virtually no other academic support for the estimates he provides.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 21:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

There is no such a term as "reliable source" in Wikipedia. A source can be reliable for one fact and unreliable for another. Let me explain something about Rummel. This scholar became prominent for two reasons. First, he introduced factor analysis in the field of historical studies. Second, he proposed a concept of "democratic peace": he provided a mathematical proof that democratic states are less prone to wage a war on each other. These two achievements are Rummel's major contribution in science. and that is the reason his books are widely cited.

Does that mean his figures are reliable? No, it does not. There are two major flaws with these figures: First, they are known to be skewed towards high values (some people say "inflated"). Second, they are a summary of obsolete data. The major flaw with Rummel's figures was explained by Harff: she explained Rummel needed a global database that contained all figures of premature deaths in all countries, and he compiled this database using available data. Harff concedes Rummel was not an expert in any country he studied, so his database is good only for rough and comparative study of several countries. Obviously, it would be unprofessional and stupid to use his data along with the data of country expert. Dulic explained Rummel's flaws in more details: Rummel takes all available data from all sources and derive low and high estimates by taking median. He does not take into account reliability of the data, he takes all data, because he believes the median is an adequate measure, because low and high values in the large set will compensate each other. However, that is fundamentally wrong. Dulic explains (quite reasonably) that whereas low values are limited with zero, high values have no limit. He explains that using an example with the Holocaust. Imagine there is one data point in the set of the Holocaust victims figures, and according to this data, 12 million Jews were killed. That would immediately shift the whole median to several millions up, and there would be needed to include into the set several works of Holocaust deniers (i.e. fringe writers claiming that 3 million of Jews were killed) to compensate for the effect of a single 12 million data point. That means the very mathematics used by Rummel inevitably leads to inflation of data. That is exacerbated by the fact that Rummel was persistently refusing to include modern data. In other words, Rummel's figures are obsolete and obtained according to a flawed statistical procedure. To preserve Wikipedia's quality, these figures should be cited only in a historical context.--Paul Siebert (talk) 22:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

I agree but we would need to cite reliable sources as you have done to refute Rummel's thesis. I spent quite a bit of time with Rummel's data back in 1997-98, I still have it on a Lotus-123 spreadsheet. He is a valuable source only because he cites data from a wide range of published material. Back in 2002 I carried on a E Mail discussion with him regarding the Soviet numbers, I pointed out that they were absurd in light of the census data. He maintained that the census data was falsified. Rosefield constructed his own population model to force a figure of 22 million on the page, even he could not plug in Rummel's 43 million. As they would say in my old neighborhood. Ehi Wheres the Rest? --Woogie 10w 23:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Refutation of Rummel is a separate question. The figures per se had never been a strongest part of his theory. I am just telling that to cite modern and good quality sources on figures and simultaneously to cite Rummel, who inaccurately summarized obsolete data would be a nonsense.


 * Regarding other sources, this is a separate question. Let's develop a common approach toward representation of Rummel's first.--Paul Siebert (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Paul, what I mean't was that if someone were to take Rummel's 1990 book to WP:RSN, chances are it would be approved as a reliable source. I completely agree with you that his estimates should only be cited in a historical context and largely said as much myself above. Woogie, I would argue that such a debate on Rummel's estimates, regarding the USSR or any other country for that matter, would best be left to his own Wikipedia article. I don't believe citing Rummel and then refuting him would be at all appropriate for this article.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 23:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * This book will not be approved by WP:RSN as a reliable source for figures, because I will present the same rationale, and every good faith editor will agree with me.--Paul Siebert (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * You say that it would not be approved by RSN, I disagree because I have dealt with them in the past. They are hit or miss. Paul if you disagree with a statistic you need a source it back up your argument. Just because it is "more modern" or "the author or publisher is of a higher grade" does not make it right, many academic sources modify statistics to push their POV. That is why I prefer using official statistics from secondary sources. Take Snyder for example, his numbers are as soft as shit but he is considered an authority who is widely cited here on Wikipedia.--Woogie 10w 00:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Woogie, (i) some sources directly say Rummel's statistics is inflated. (ii) Other sources explain a fundamental flaw with it. (iii) Rummel is not cited as a source for figures by any country expert: try to find a reference to his data in Wheatcroft's, Ellman's, Maksudov's, Rosefielde's articles. The only two reasons for using Rummel are (i) to push a very specific POV, or (ii) to explain a history of the subject.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree with you 100%, but in the real world of talking heads on Fox News Rummel is an authority. Wikipedia has to deal with this reality. It is not our job to post only the statistic that we determine is correct. If a stat is wrong we need to point out a source that backs up our arguments. WP:NPOV--Woogie 10w 00:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Woogie, NPOV means "carefully and critically analyzing a variety of reliable sources and then attempting to convey to the reader the information contained in them fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without editorial bias. " If there is a reason to conclude some source is unreliable, it is beyond the scope, period.
 * Let me reiterate, Rummel's theory of "democratic peace" is notable, and his book is a good source for that. His world database of democide is notable as a tool for general comparative analysis, although modern authors see flaws with it. However, his data for each particular country are obsolete and flawed. I see no problem with that, if, for example, Linus Pauling got two Nobel Prizes for determination of structure of peptides and development of principles of quantum chemistry, it does not make him an expert in medicine, so he is not a reliable source for Vitamin C effects on human organism (although he made some claims on that account).--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Rummel-try to find a reference to his data in Rosefielde's articles, ah shucks Paul, Rosefielde cites the guy left and right. --Woogie 10w 00:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I know he cites Rummel. My question is: does he use Rummel's data? I am pretty sure he doesn't. The experts in Soviet history treat Rummel as we threat Wikipedia: he just summarises what they themselves write, and does it in a flawed way, so no real expert in clear mind will cite Rummel's figures.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Those historians working after the Soviet Union's dissolution have estimated victim totals ranging from approximately 3 million[4][2][5][6] to nearly 30 million.[7][8][9]
Many historians have calculated the number of victims to 15 - 30 million, why is it reported that 89 historians give 3-9 million? [Erni] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erni120 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Request for punishment. J. Giffin
This man is still censoring higher scores, although historians say that the majority of them recognize 20 milinas as the number of victims Stalin writes about 3 - 9 and censor the data. This man will soon write that Stalin did not kill anyone and that it was German propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erni120 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Exactly how was anything censored? If anything, it was you who removed Snyder as a source in the lede. I restored a version of the article which was built by consensus on this talk page, with minor alteration of the text. If you can't participate on talk without spewing ad hominem attacks and baseless accusations, and if you insist on edit warring, perhaps you shouldn't be here.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 04:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * What sources higher score are coming from? There are three groups of sources. First, pre-1990 books (obsolete sources). Second, various journalists who non-critically reproduce old stereotypes. Third, Rosefielde. Per our policy, we are supposed to base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. If some source is obsolete, it should not be used. If some source does not duly scrutinize facts, it should not be used. For example, the sources saying that Hitler killed 12 million Jews should be rejected, however, that would not be the Holocaust denial.


 * Modern sources (except those that non-critically reproduce obsolete data) says the number of deaths caused by Stalin was lower that we thought earlier. That does not mean he didn't kill people.


 * If you believe someone is engaged in disruptive editing, or have other complains, please, go to WP:ANI. However, think twice, per WP:BOOMERANG.--Paul Siebert (talk) 04:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It seems we largely see eye to eye on the issue of sourcing. And one of the sources Erni recently added falls into the second category I believe. I have a feeling the historians for this "Institute of National Remembrance" get their 20 million estimate for the years 1917-1991 (which goes beyond the scope of an article dealing strictly with excess mortality under Stalin) from the controversial intro to The Black Book of Communism. Just a guess. It's odd how some sources put 20 million for the Stalin period alone and others for the entire history of the USSR. Like I insisted earlier, and I think you'll agree with me, superfluous sources and estimates varying in the tens of millions should not be stuffed into the article on a whim, which is basically what Erni seems to be doing. He insists I'm "censoring higher calculations" when I restore clean edits, which is a baseless accusation as higher estimates were already present in the article to begin with, but in their proper historical context which he doesn't like.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 05:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * By the way, my impression of the Brent's book is that he just cites the figures of 20 million victims in the introduction, but he does not endorse it. His own research is devoted to a totally different subject, so I am not sure we need to use this source, because it is unclear where Brent took this figure from.--Paul Siebert (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I remember thinking the same thing years ago as I was flipping through the book at a local bookstore. Brent seems to pull this number out of thin air, and does not provide any sources for this estimate. It would seem to me to be an unreliable source on the subject given this. Very shoddy scholarship I must say. This is the biggest problem with much of the scholarship on excess mortality under Stalin, with authors and so-called historians just creating huge numbers out of whole cloth with no attribution, which is why I insist on citing academic sources with extensive documentation on related Wikipedia articles, in particular Wheatcroft and Ellman who thoroughly document how they get their estimations.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 15:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * He does not pull these numbers, he says that other people believe 20 millions were killed. Remember, he says that in the introduction, this figure is not a part of his study, it is not his figure. --Paul Siebert (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Wheatcroft did not thoroughly document how he got his estimate of 5.7 million, I was able to back into his number because he mentioned his use of the "Lormier corrections". Lormier is on the web Go for it, its a nice little puzzle to figure out.--Woogie 10w 18:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

No one is denying that Stalin killed anybody this page is to show people what historians came up with with historical fact and researching with archival data what the total number of deaths are which are around 9 million with archival data and just because it's lower than we thought doesn't means he is any less evil than he was before. Jack90s15 (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Rephrasing sentences not deleting
Putting Richard Piper after some historians claim it could be 20 million so people can see it in chronological order. The different death tolls after that sentence. Jack90s15 (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

When you go on Google and type in how many people did Stalin or Joseph Stalin kill on Google I was using the search engine for that you get 2 answers
When you go on Google and type in how many people did Stalin or Joseph Stalin kill on Google I was using the search engine for that you get this

for how many people did Stalin kill you get Soviet famine of 1932–33. The deaths of 5.7 to prehaps 7.0 million people in the 1932–1933 famine and collectivization of agriculture are included among the victims of repression during the period of Stalin by some historians And it highlights the seven million number

and when you type in how many people did Joseph Stalin kill you get

Some historians claim that the death toll was around 20 million based on their own demographic analysis and from dated information published before the release of the reports from the Soviet archives Simon Sebag Montefiore in 2004 suggested that Stalin was ultimately responsible for the deaths of between 20 and 25 ...

Before the other person edited the thing without really saying why it said this on Google

Those historians working after the Soviet Union's dissolution have estimated victim totals ranging from approximately 3 million to nearly 9 million. Some scholars still assert that the death toll could be in the tens of millions

Prior to the collapse of the USSR and the archival revelations,some historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher

Is there any way that we can be wrote it back to saying that for Google because when you type it you get is the famine number? and the other one i posted Jack90s15 (talk) 18:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Googling is not the best way to obtain an adequate information, because it ranks the results based on popularity. It combines good sources with garbage. Read WP:PSTS as a starting point.--Paul Siebert (talk) 21:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks if only more people read Jack90s15 (talk) 21:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Excess mortality in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin
The Title of the article is ludicrous since most of the excess deaths in the Stalin era were due to the war 1941-45. (27 million) BTW when Khrushchev announced that war dead were 20 million, demographers in the west assumed that the balance of 7-9 million was due to Stalinist repression. Research in Russia in the 1990's has revealed that there were 4.1 million famine deaths in the occupied regions and 3 million in the rear(70% evacuated people) That explains the difference. Ehi.Capisciu?Woogie 10w 22:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * There are several problems with this title, but other titles would be even more problematic.
 * In general, there is an intrinsic flaw in the article's subject. We cannot speak seriously about the number of death attributed to Stalin for two fundamental reasons. First, the category is poorly defined: are we talking about all premature deaths, or we are talking about "victims of Stalinism"? Should an ordinary criminal executed for manslaughter by NKVD be considered a victim? Do we have to consider all Gulag inmate who died in captivity "victims of Stalinism"? Which fraction of early infant deaths should be considered "premature"? And so on. Actually, these premature deaths form a continuous spectrum from direct murder and executions to almost normal mortality, and the placement of a borderline is a matter of judgement. Actually, when different scholars provide different number, that is usually not because the figures are not known, but because they speak about different categories.
 * Second, to speak about excess mortality based on demographic evidences is also very shaky approach. The problem is that the natural mortality was rapidly declining during Stalin's time, so the deaths that could be considered "natural" in early 20s, could be considered "non-natural" in late 40s, because the quality of life and health service was rapidly improving. In other words, the accusations of excess mortality are sometimes due to the fact that the regime was temporarily rolling back high living standards that it itself created. As Ellman correctly noted, besides a large number of excess deaths, the regime caused a large number of excess lives. That should be taken into account if we want to create a comprehensive picture of a general effect of Stalin's regime on Soviet demography.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I deal with reliable sources that can be verified, off Wikipedia we could debate and nitpick the topic all day. Here is a reliable source that covers the topic on a general level I like to deal with real numbers from reliable sources.--Woogie 10w 00:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Again, that is the matter of judgement. For example, if we assume 3 million famine death in Soviet controlled territories, does that mean all of them were repression victims? Had the regime adequate capabilities of providing them with food? Ok, let me ask more simple question: the citizens of Leningrad who starved to death during the blockade, are they the victims of Stalinism? Had Stalin any real intention to kill them, or the deaths should be directly attributed to Hitler? The fact that people were dying from hunger is the fact. However, the statement that those deaths should be attributed to Stailn is a judgement.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * We could debate the topic all day long Paul, in modern Russian sources they are war dead! Victims of the Nazi invaders! Our POV does not count on Wikipedia--Woogie 10w 00:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Paul, using your logic the Allies were responsible for the Holocaust because they declared war on Hitler-Germany--Woogie 10w 00:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I think you misunderstand my logic, and I have a feeling I misunderstand yours. Do you agree that war time civilian deaths in the USSR (including even a part of Gulag deaths) cannot be attributed to Stalin, even despite the fact that they occurred at the territory that was under his control?--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I think you misunderstand my logic, I posted this so you could see how the repression statistics fit into the overall population balance. This is the accounting proof, our numbers tie out. Off Wiki I put the ADK numbers on an Excel spreadsheet, using a declining death rate I tied out ie. agreed to the ADK balance in the Stalin era. I wish somehow I could get this on Wikipedia, but this is not possible since it is OR. However, I have the satisfaction of knowing that the archival GULAG material is in sync with the ADK population balance. A total of 13-14 million civilian deaths in the war make sense. They were caused by the Hunger Plan 6% of the occupied population-4 million, German atrocities in the partisan war and forced labor 3 million, Leningrad 1 million, the Holocaust 2 million, and losses of 3 million of the 20 million civilians evacuated. The real figure of military dead was 11-12 million when you include 3 million POWs. The Stalin era 1927-53 figures of 27 million war dead, 3 million Gulag-repression, 7 million collectivization dead and 1 million in 1947 famine agrees to the ADK balance of 38 million. This is my logic.--Woogie 10w 02:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * What is ADK?--Paul Siebert (talk) 03:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Ehi,capisciu?--Woogie 10w 11:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello,Andreev, E.M., Darsky, L.E. and Khar'kova,--Woogie 10w 11:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The article title is an oxymoron. Excess mortality in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin Excess mortality includes the war as well as repression. Excess mortality might be defined in other ways, for example a hypothetical USSR that had living conditions similar to western Europe, in that case the the annual death rate would be lower. Take bourgeois Poland for example in 1920, the natural death rate was 2.8%, by 1939 it had fallen to 1.4% according to official Polish figures. In the socialist USSR the death rate was also 2.8% in 1922 and by 1939 it had fallen to 1.96% according to ADK data. I post these figures to illustrate how some historians come up with higher hypothetical repression figures in the absence of archival data. In the socialist USSR they built the factories in the east that eventually helped win the war, the human cost was enormous. The collectivization of agriculture and the transfer,according to Lormier,of 20 million persons eastward helps explain the higher number of natural deaths in the USSR. These people were "free", they were not in the Gulag. The collectivization of agriculture and the transfer of the population eastwards was forced not voluntary. --Woogie 10w 01:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

The article's structure
Actually, in this article, we have to describe two different types of events. First, during Stalin's rule, many people were killed (murdered, executed, starved to death) according to direct orders of Stalin or his heirs. The sources that tell about that are archival documents and memoirs. Second, Stalin's policy had serious demographic effects. The sources telling about that are various statistical data.

We cannot mix these two types of data, because these data carry totally different information. The data about executions tell what exactly happened to concrete people, and how exactly had they died. In contrast, demographic data just tell how had population changed during some period. These changes might occur for many reasons: people could be killed, died from hunger, diseases, they could have migrated, they could have never been born. To say that "Stalin was killing people, and population losses were XX millions" would imply all population losses were due to mass killings, which was definitely not the case.

In connection to that, I propose to separate all data on two large sections. The first one describes documented mass killings during the Stalin's rule. The second one describes the overall effect of Stalin's rule on the demography of the USSR. I also propose to rewrite the lead, because it should start with the explanation of what happened in the USSR under Stalin, and only then the figures should be presented.--Paul Siebert (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I back it I think the title still should be excess mortality in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin
 * I think the only things that should be rearranged are the beginning of the page
 * Move this to the bottom. of the Total number of victims
 * Estimates of the number of deaths attributable to Joseph Stalin vary widely. Some scholars assert that record-keeping of the executions of political prisoners and ethnic minorities are neither reliable nor complete, others contend archival materials contain irrefutable data far superior to sources utilized prior to 1991, such as statements from emigres and other informants
 * And leave the opening of the article to this
 * Those historians working after the Soviet Union's dissolution have estimated victim totals ranging from approximately 3 million to nearly 9 million. Some scholars still assert that the death toll could be in the tens of millions
 * Prior to the collapse of the USSR and the archival revelations, some historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher. After the Soviet Union dissolved, evidence from the Soviet archives also became available, containing official records of 799,455 executions (1921–1953), around 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag some 390,000 deaths during kulak forced resettlement and up to 400,000 deaths of persons deported to Forced settlements in the Soviet Union during the 1940’s – with a total of about 3.3 million officially recorded victims in these categories.The deaths of at least 5.5 to 6.5 million persons in the famine of 1932–33 are sometimes, but not always, included with the victims of the Stalin era. Those historians working after the Soviet Union's dissolution have estimated victim totals ranging from approximately 3 million  to nearly 9 million. Some scholars still assert that the death toll could be in the tens of millions
 * I think it's a great opener Jack90s15 (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

My approval was accepted we now have protection! It feels good to contribute to what people use for their historical knowledge
It feels good to contribute to what people use for their historical knowledge Jack90s15 (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed event - German prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
Approximately three million German prisoners of war were captured by the Soviet Union during World War II, most of them during the great advances of the Red Army in the last year of the war, the West German government set up a Commission headed by Erich Maschke to investigate the fate of German POW in the war, in its report of 1974 they found that 3,060,000[1].According to Richard Overy , Russian sources maintain that 356,000 out of 2,388,000 POWs died in Soviet captivity.[2] Hoveever German West Commission claim that 1,094,250 germans died in captivity (549,360 from 1941-April 1945; 542,911 from May 1945 to June 1950 and 1,979 from July 1950 to 1955).[3] Soviet era sources are disputed by historians in the west who estimate 3.0 million German POWs were taken by the USSR and up to 1.0 million died in Soviet captivity[4].

[1]Rüdiger Overmans, Soldaten hinter Stacheldraht. Deutsche Kriegsgefangene des Zweiten Weltkriege. Ullstein., 2000 Page 277 ISBN 3-549-07121-3 [2] -Overy, Richard (1997). Russias War. Penguin. p. 297. ISBN 1575000512. Overy notes on p.364: Overy notes on p.364: "I am very grateful to James Bacque for letting me see the official figures supplied to him for his work on his book, Crimes and Mercies (London, 1997). The figures are drawn from a report of the chief of the Prison Department of the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 'war prisoners of the former European armies for the period 1941 ‐ 1945', dated 28 April 1956. On contemporary estimates see D. Dallin and B. Nicolaevsky, Forced Labour in Soviet Russia (London, 1948), pp. 277 ‐ 8. On Japan, SI Kuznetsov, 'The Situation of Japanese Prisoners of War in Soviet Camps', journal of Slavic Military Studies 8 (1995). [3]Erich Maschke, Zur Geschichte der deutschen Kriegsgefangenen des Zweiten Weltkrieges Bielefeld, E. und W. Gieseking, 1962-1974 Vol 15 p. 224 [4] Rüdiger Overmans, Soldaten hinter Stacheldraht. Deutsche Kriegsgefangene des Zweiten Weltkriege. Ullstein., 2000 Page 246 ISBN 3-549-07121-3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erni120 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I doubt German POWs can be considered as Soviet population. It would be very confusing to include them (and most scholarly sources do not do that).--Paul Siebert (talk) 02:03, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a fork, the topic is covered in a separate article.--Woogie 10w 02:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * German POWs are not part of the Soviet population they be come POWs from nazi policies not Soviet Jack90s15 (talk) 21:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)