Talk:Exnora International

POV status of "alert" and "sensitise" on the context of Exnora International
I don't find "alert" or "sensitise" are POV on the context of this organization because their prime objective is, focusing on preserving nature and preventing environmental degradation.EconomicTiger (talk) 07:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't follow your argument. I can't see how the organization's prime objective, whatever it is, may remove the inherent pov on the language used. Also, I believe I'm not the only user that dislikes the way you want it put. --Damiens .rf 22:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I am nervous for anymore reverts. However I am not satisfied the rationale put forwarded by you. You have become the POV of the whole episode, and not the phrase used, based on your previous edits on the article. Cheers.EconomicTiger (talk) 12:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * "Alert" and "sensitize" are not straightforward or encyclopedic descriptions. They put a slight spin on things that I don't think is the best wording. If you want to say something about alerting and sensitizing people, find a quote from the organization that says that's what they're doing. It's not impartial wording. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * We should be careful in this. I've seen many articles that overuse/abuse quotes in a way to give a subliminal impression of endorsement. Since this article already gives the correct neutral information, it shouldn't be changed to contain a (copyrighted/non-free) alternative wording. --Damiens .rf 13:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)