Talk:Exodus of 1879

Untitled
I agree that merging the articles is appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.33.72.143 (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Merge Exodusters
It doesn't seem that there is anything appreciably unique that can be said about Exodusters so I recommend merging it here.

--Mcorazao (talk) 03:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I support a merge. faithless   (speak)  10:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

No they should not be merged. Exodusters were unique in their own way —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.25.32.177 (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The Merging of Exodusters into the Exodus of 1879
I believe that neither of the two articles are very rich in detail, and don't offer as comprehensive an analysis as could be possible in their respective topics. If the two were to merge, and if a person searching for either of the two specifically could be redirected to the new article, I am of the opinion that they would only help each other. I'm all for the merging of the two, and if someone could put some more illuminating information into the new improved article, it would be much appreciated.