Talk:Expedition Everest/Archive 1

Press Release
As of a Dec. 23, 2005, revision, the majority of this article is now a verbatim press release from Walt Disney World. Whoville

Which, I don't think makes the article look very good. It puts a weird slant on it. WestJet

I agree

The publicity material has been removed and replaced with original content. Whoville 17:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

April??
Why does it say that the grand opening is in April? I just went on it yesterday (February 20, 2006).--Martin925 17:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Disney typically invites members of the press, celebrities, travel agents, corporate partners, etc., to an "official" opening following a "soft opening" period. In the case of Expedition Everest, that event is scheduled for April 7, 2006. Disney has said publicly that the attraction will be operating in a "sneak peek" mode until then, meaning it's not guaranteed to be open. The same thing happened with Mission: SPACE; the attraction soft-opened without any fanfare on August 15, 2003, and had its grand opening on October 9 with an elaborate private ceremony for invited guests. Whoville 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Good answer above. Also, all amusement rides go through 'soft opening' periods, where the operating staff get to put the ride through its paces.  This gives the staff and the park an idea of what to expect when a ride "officially" opens.  There are still aspects of EE that are still being tweaked and corrected, so people who ride the ride early in the preview period will most likely have experienced a ride that can be different from the ride that's open on 'opening day'.  SpikeJones 01:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Name of mountain
Info I've seen says that the name of the mountain itself is "Forbidden Mountain" (capitalized). I don't believe that the mountain itself is supposed to be Everest (the name, as the article says, refers to making an expedition TO Everest). Anybody have more info? SpikeJones 01:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What more info do you need? The article explains it pretty clearly. The mountain is not Everest, though Everest's peak is seen in the "distance." The train travels through the "forbidden" mountain as a shortcut to the base of Everest. The attraction's "subtitle" is Legend of the Forbidden Mountain but I don't think the mountain is literally meant to have the formal name Forbidden Mountain. Whoville 04:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

That's the question - is the mountain's formal name "Forbidden Mountain"? If not, then what is the mountain's name? (ex: Typhoon Lagoon has Mount Mayday and Blizzard Beach has Mount Gushmore and Splash Mountain could be referred to as Chickapin Hill, etc )  SpikeJones 05:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * From what I've seen through research direct from Disney (being a stockholder), the official formal name is the Forbidden Mountain. It's just, due to the name, everyone calls it Everest. 01kkk 3:58, 25, November, 2006


 * There is in fact a pair of fake binoculars (sp.?) across the river from the mountain along with the silhouettes of himalayan peaks. "Forbidden Mountain" on the chart looks identical to the expedition everest mountain, while "Mount Everest" on the chart looks very different. This chart was there less than a year ago when I last visited. 64.252.105.145 19:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Infobox vs. Attraction facts
I think it's pointless to have both an Infobox and the Attraction facts. I lean towards Attraction facts, they're consistant across (almost) all Disney Attractions and more room is used to expand details and include more "Disney specific" info that non-Disney roller coasters wouldn't have.
 * Agreed. And the $100 million price tag is pure speculation with no attribution. Disney never reveals the cost of its attractions and the calculation of numbers tossed around in media coverage by theme park industry sources is never explained. But those numbers get repeated again and again as gospel. Whoville 04:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

g's?
I rode this a little over a week ago. I've been trying to find out the maximum g-force, but I can't find it anywhere. It would be nice if someone could find that and add it to the article. Bubba73 (talk), 17:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Expedition Everest Logo.jpg
Image:Expedition Everest Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Sick Yeti?
The animatronic Yeti has been frozen in place for years-- it was apparently only operational for a few months before some damage (possibly to its foundation) necessitated its shutdown. Not too surprisingly, there's no official word that this has happened, and although I can find some respectable references, none that I can find mention any dates of when this problem began. Here's one such reference (but without any dates):
 * http://land.allears.net/blogs/jackspence/2010/04/expedition_everest_legend_of_t_2.html

Is this relevant to be included? I'm finding it difficult to word an addition that doesn't include a date. Gurnec (talk) 13:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Unless there is an official statement from Disney regarding the status of the Yeti (beyond what is already known, with regards to the Yeti having an "A" and "B" mode), then adding anything to the article will most likely be removed as speculation or WP:OR. SpikeJones (talk) 22:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

basketball court
Is it true that there is a basketball court inside the mountain facade, unseen to riders? Spxmet (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC).
 * No. That's a different Disney mountain. SpikeJones (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Good article preparation
I'm going to start working on this article to get it to GA status. This will be the first Disney article I will nominate so if anyone has anything to contribute, feel free to. I noticed there's barely any references so I think that'll need the most attention.--Astros4477 (talk) 02:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll try and help out with this where I can. If there are any pictures here that you would like transferred over I'd be more than happy to help. Themeparkgc   Talk  06:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Themeparkgc, do you think the Everest in the City section is needed? I feel like it doesn't do much for the article.--Astros4477 (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I think a mention of the promotion should be kept but the quote ripped out and replaced with probably two sentences that summarise it. Obviously sources would also need to be found. Themeparkgc   Talk  23:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅--Astros4477 (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Copy edit, November 2012

 * Facts: "This is accomplished through two sets of track switches before and after the rear segment." This needs disambiguating to one of:
 * This is accomplished through two sets of track switches, one before the rear segment and one after.
 * This is accomplished through two sets of track switches before the rear segment and two after.
 * --Stfg (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * -- Astros4477 ( talk ) 21:08, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Facts: "This was the second Disney roller coaster to have a backwards section, the first being Indiana Jones et le Temple du Péril: Backwards! at Disneyland Resort Paris (2000-2004).[11] However, it was the first roller coaster to be built with backwards sections.[12]" I'm confused. Why is this not a direct contradiction? --Stfg (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Well there is some confusion about this. This source says "The Everest ride is the first in any Disney park in which a roller coaster travels backward" althought RCDB says the Indiana Jones roller coaster went backwards from 2000 - 2004, before Everest opened. So we're trying to say Everest was the first Disney coaster to originally built with backwards sections.-- Astros4477 ( talk ) 21:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah. Well, I suppose that in those years, either the Indiana Jones did go backwards or it didn't, and if it did, then the first source is just wrong, isn't it? But are we saying that Indiana Jones went backwards all the way, whereas Everest had both backwards and forwards sections? --Stfg (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * With Indiana Jones they just spun the train around and ran it backwards for that period. Everest had the first seconds going forwards and backwards in the one ride. Maybe a source could be found to support a statement about having the first mid-course track switches in a Disney coaster? Themeparkgc   Talk  22:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll try to find one.-- Astros4477 ( talk ) 22:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Great. I think we've got the sense now, so I've tried some wording. Is it OK? --Stfg (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes. Sounds good. Themeparkgc   Talk  00:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC)