Talk:Expedition of Dumat al-Jandal

"He also claims that the lust of the Muslim's to plunder was extended to a far wider range." What does it mean to say 'somebody's lust to plunder was extended to a wider range". It's really objective history writing, isn't it? All of the article explains how a ruler dealt with the insecurity threats to his state posed by a band of bandits, and then suddenly, like magic, this conclusion ends this article.  Did the author measure that particular "lust", and if yes, how? This is not objective and must be removed.