Talk:Expedition of Uyainah bin Hisn

First. Here are what i think are valid reasons to keep info boxes 1. In this particular expedition, 63 people were captured according to some sources. So i think it justifies an info box, as it is large number, similar to the number captured in the Battle of Badr (which has an info box) 2. Consistency, some battles/expeditions have them and some dont e.g Battle of Badr has it, while others dont. Which i dont think is consistent 3. Summary, the info boxes summarise the article, this is beneficial to anyone

also, a criticism is that the results section might be biased because i claimed that the expedition was a "succesfull" in many of them? however i said this from an objective point of view. i try identify the objective, and see if it is met. if it is, then i claim it is successful. The the objective in this expedition i believe was to get tax. so saying it was successful i dont think is biased. However i dont mind removing the word successful and just explaining what happened in the results section--Misconceptions2 (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * "63 people were captured", eh? In that case its a rubbish infobox, cos it says: Result: 50 men, women and children captured. But the number captured is irrelevant. The point is that this page is too short to need a summary, and the infobox itself is nearly empty. Other, longer pages might need summary William M. Connolley (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)