Talk:Expert Infantryman Badge

An Army Regulation manual contains the Army Regulation and the regulation is the authority, not the manual... Deathbunny 22:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

18Ds (Special Forces Medics) are now eligible for the CIB as of 03JUN05. http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/UniformedServices/Badges/combat_infantryman.aspx I'm not fully familiar with Wikipedia standards, so it's nice if someone could fix that. CWslater 2243, 12 August 2010 (EDT) —Preceding undated comment added 00:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC).

"True blue" and blue ink pens?
No one in the Army uses a blue pen. Soldiers carry black ink pens. This claim is urban legend nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.185.105 (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

This is wrong blue and black are both allowed in uniform. Red is often used for corrections. For the sake of EIB many grade blue as go and red as no go. This is from experience as a EIB candidate and graded Cowsthatfloat (talk) 03:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Expert Infantryman Badge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017045050/http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r600_8_22.pdf to http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r600_8_22.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

ROK soldier image
The EIB is a us army award, And primarily for us army infantrymen there was no need or context to having the only photo being a Korean soldier get the award. That makes no sense. I added a foreign military section to include the rok soldier and will continue adding different militaries who have participated.

I do not want this to turn into a fight over editing again. It has been a problem that non-military or non infantry editors continue to put misinformation in the infantry sections. Cowsthatfloat (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)