Talk:Extended Project Qualification

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extended Project Qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005050623/http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/AQA-9990-EPQ-W-SP.PDF to http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/AQA-9990-EPQ-W-SP.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Dead link removal
I am replacing a dead link and rationalising the content in the introduction. I have found one source as a replacement citation but if not considered by others as sufficiently valid then it should be upgraded with an alternative citation.Vincentvangolf (talk) 01:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Additional citation
In line with the template message that additional citations are required, a citation (John Catt Educational) has been added to support an unsubstantiated point at the end of the introduction. If a higher quality citation can be found then this one should be replaced Vincentvangolf (talk) 06:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Restrictions
The second paragraph of the Description section mentions restrictions which are unsubstantiated. The evidence from AQA suggests that there are fewer restrictions. Therefore if a citation cannot be found to support what is there then this needs replacing with evidence that can be supported.Vincentvangolf (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * In the absence of any support for the unsubstantiated assertion, the sentence has been edited and support added. Vincentvangolf (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)