Talk:Extinct Kannada literature

Not pre-classical
If you guys want to keep pushing this POV, be my guest: we'll keep debating this. A literature from which not only no fragment or wisp of fragment has survived today, but also no fragment or wisp of fragment had survived in 850 AD, a literature from which not a single quote can be found in any later author writing during the period 850 to 1400 AD, is not called pre-classical literature. Indeed it is not even called literature. It is a dead and gone might have been. Consider the 90,000 verses of Chudamani. Do you really believe that not a single verse of this remarkable body of work would have survived in a culture that had a longstanding tradition of oral transmission and of great fidelity?

Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  22:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir, I am a native Kannada speaker and have read the work 'Kavirajamarga'. I am not sure if you can read and write let alone speak Kannada. Also, I am not sure what was your motivation to pen such a comment in the Talk section. The only problem I found in this article is that the presentation of the subject in English needs further enhancement. Rrohit23021981 (talk) 01:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)