Talk:Extreme Tourist

This article has been provided to give a more detailed and accurate definition of the increasingly common term extreme tourist and to differentiate it from the concepts and terms of extreme tourism and extreme sports. Therefore it is not in the interests of accuracy nor will it be concise nor comprehnsive to merge this article with the article extreme tourism, these are two difference concepts. Blake7 07:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That should be "different concepts". Total bollocks, you are mangling the English lanuage to say anything other than that "an extreme tourist is one who indulges in extreme tourism". If you really claim a different concept, find another name for it. In any case you were just spamming the extremetourist website. -- RHaworth 08:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I meant "different concepts". Perhaps you're right, but the problem is that the terms extreme tourist and extreme tourism are at odds, that is an extreme tourist is not one that indulges in extreme tourism as you put it - at least by the definition of extreme tourism as given by Wikipedia. It might be that the definition of extreme tourism needs to be greatly overhauled. I had a look at a lot of websites and discussions before forwarding this definition, but there is a lot of misunderstanding and ambiguous use out there. As for spamming it is not my intention to spam any website, but perhaps you can explain to me how I am. Blake7 08:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Your contribution history gives me very strong reason to suspect that your sole pupose in contributing to Wikipedia is to promote your website. Don't try and con me. -- RHaworth 09:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm. I don't have a "contribution history" as this is my first submission. The strong-arm tactics from yourself have been very disappointing and I now find myself somewhat disillusioned about Wikipedia, now I understand what the critics are on about. Obviously you have to take what you read on Wikipedia with a grain of salt when the likes of yourself do not allow reasonable discussion on such a point. My purpose for making this submission was one of pure education, I removed links so that there could be no accusations of site promotion. Now, looking at your "contribution history" one has to wonder about your attitude and what your motives are. Oh well, one can only try and help, I won't even bother getting upset by your poor attitude. Blake7 09:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)