Talk:Eye tracking

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 9 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dorseyc90. Peer reviewers: Paulgabriola1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mikejzel.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments
saccade? --Abdull 14:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Military use? im sure that the WAH-64 (Apache) has eye tracking for the gunner....if you look at the helmet,it has a section which comes up and covers the eye,and,if you watch a video,as he moves his head,the 30mm follows his head,if not his eyes.should military be included on these lists?Pikajedi3 16:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

There is another interesting HCI-use described here: An Alternative to the Computer Mouse (in "Technology Review"). These eye-tracking techniques ("EyePoint" etc.) should be combined with speech recognition. Instead of one or even several "hot keys" spoken commands should be used. It would not be too difficult to discern between a couple of words. Christian Storm 14:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Merge with "Eye tracker"?
Why not? Tony 14:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * What happened to the merge proposal? It looks like a good idea to me. --lquilter 14:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * So is a merger possible? It would be relatively simple, but I don't know how to do it technically. Does anyone object? Tony 23:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Use the and  templates. (documentation at Template:Mergeto and Template:Mergefrom.) Post them for a while (a couple of weeks, maybe) & see what people think. If nobody objects or has other better ideas, then go for it. (I'd do it but not quite sure what you have in mind, in terms of from/to, and inclusion of content.) --lquilter 00:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Headline text
Eye Tracking Technology Breakthroughs 11-05-2015 Zoopid Ideas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biomedicus (talk • contribs) 18:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Commercial technology
Could this section be updated? At the moment it feels like a commercial for a certain product, surely the liberal use of trademarks is not necessary?Protiek 00:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * An editor, Lucs-kho, just did a lot of work, most of which was improvement. (Some of the specific deletions I thought took out useful technology, so I reworked that editor's stuff.) The reworking gives the article the structure of a reasonably neutral & encyclopedic approach to the subject, although it's definitely still a bit clunky. The "commercial blah blah" section has now been split into subsections under applications & technologies, which I think is better. It's still subheaded as "commercial X" which probably is not the ultimate ideal, but in the meantime points out that the sections are overdeveloped & probably inserted by those industries.  --lquilter 14:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree that the use of images with trademark designations is contrary to the spirit and possibly the rules of wikipedia. And the use of three certainly gives it an air of an ad. --lquilter 14:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I've now taken out the unnecessary &trade; symbols. See Wikipedia_talk:Trademark_notices for some earlier discussion of this topic and why these notices are not necessary; see also Fair use (US trademark law). I didn't remove the images themselves at this point. I still think there are issues in terms of appearing to promote particular companies but until there are substitutes available I thought they were better than nothing. --lquilter 00:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I completely agree that the commercial blah blah is not in the spirit of wikipedia. I started rewriting the entire article, with the idea that most of the technology stuff should be in the "eye tracker" section. After all, there are many, many interesting things that could be said about various eye trackers and their properties (much more than currently said), and it would be better not to mix too much technological detail into the "eye tracking" section which I think should be about the major research question, assumptions, history, methodologies and conferences. Most of the fixation, saccade, smooth persuit and other ocolumotor stuff could go into the "eye movement" section. Also, I think it would be useful to have an "How to make an eye tracking study" section, with sort of basic recipy for this kind of research, which I think many students around the world would appreciate.���Lucs-kho 15:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * It sounds great; your changes are really helpful. I wanted to keep some of the technology in for the present because it was helpful, and it wasn't otherwise in.  However, as you rewrite the article, we should keep revisiting it. I'm going to be mostly hands-off in terms of adding content while you work on it, but will pop in on editing & smoothing out references & the like. (And with opinions.) --lquilter 22:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Can I add "http://www.axistive.com/cameramouse-uses-the-webcam-for-computer-control.html" CameraMouse Uses the Webcam for Computer Control some info on a commercial product I written about?

Intention to merge the article "Eye tracker" into this one
In a few days' time, unless someone thinks of a good reason not to. Tony 08:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Who is "Huey" introduced in second section?
"Huey built what might be the first eye tracker," ??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.69.112 (talk) 04:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Poor man's eye tracking
I am wondering if mention of "poor man's eye tracking" would be appropriate in this article http://www.stcsig.org/sn/PDF/Cooke_mouse_eye_tracker.pdf --Bcjordan (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

eye tracking and diagnosis of autism/asperger?
Please write something about diagnosing ASD with eye-tracking equipment. It is a widely known fact that people who have this disorders do not concentrate their sight on eyes but rather on mouth, or not on faces altogether. This is not always readily visible by simply looking at eyeball of that person because he may learn that it is rude to avoid eye contact so is looking very close to interlocutor's eyes but his eye movement doesn't follow the patter exhibited by normal people. pwjbbb (talk) 21:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Dr. Innocenti's comment on this article
Dr. Innocenti has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

"Introduce among the Applications also Behavioral Economic Research"

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Innocenti has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


 * Reference : Alessandro Innocenti & Alessandra Rufa & Jacopo Semmoloni, 2009. "Overconfident Behavior In Informational Cascades: An Eye-Tracking Study," Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID) University of Siena 1109, Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID), University of Siena.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Updates
This article is rather heterogeneous. Eye tracking research and technology advanced a lot in recent years. I'll add information our current knowledge in little packages over the next weeks. peterkonig 3 June 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterKonig (talk • contribs) 13:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Eye tracking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927004541/http://www.newcarnet.co.uk/Lexus_news.html?id=5787 to http://www.newcarnet.co.uk/Lexus_news.html?id=5787
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907093047/http://ged.insead.edu/fichiersti/inseadwp2001/2001-19.pdf to http://ged.insead.edu/fichiersti/inseadwp2001/2001-19.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061011024317/http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/newDriverDistraction.html to http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/newDriverDistraction.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717051418/http://www.thomasrecording.com/en/cms/front_content.php?idcatart=63&lang=1&client=1 to http://www.thomasrecording.com/en/cms/front_content.php?idcatart=63&lang=1&client=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

About the convolutional neural network image
It occurred to me that the image used to describe the convolutional neural network is wrong: the dimensions of the net cannot change when passing from a convolutional layer to a maxpooling or an activation layer Maccarismos (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)