Talk:Eyre Highway/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok you know the drill......Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The highway was constructed between July 1941 and June 1942, but was trafficable by January 1942. - trafficable by what?
 * Is that really necessary? Surely in the context of a 20th century highway trafficable refers to vehicles? Note also that the source only describes it as trafficable without specifying by what. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess trafficable can mean by any car or by some cars (such as 4WD only), but it is moot if source doesn't specify. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I see your point now, but as you say its moot due to the source not specifying - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * link saltbush
 * to the set index article saltbush, or is it reasonable to assume Atriplex? - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I think Atriplex is more accurate link. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Done - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 *  Eyre Highway has a mixed performance in terms of road safety, compared to other major highways in Australia.  - not sure this sentence adds anything. I'd let the two following sentences speak for themselves...
 * Removed - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * link limestone outcrops
 * Limestone or outcrop?
 * I think outcrop there - could link limestone separately there or make a case for IAR link at second mention a couple of sentences on to avoid run-on bluelinks of consecutive words. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Done, with limestone linked at the second mention (avoiding consecutive links is actually in the MOS – WP:SEAOFBLUE) - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * link bitumen
 * Done - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 *  a decade long program - hyphen?
 * Added - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

ok, hang on.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - great, well done. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)