Talk:Ezio (security)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Totziens (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I suggest retaining this page for several reasons: 1)to tidy up content on the crowded Gemalto page. The first draft of this page is already-existing content from that page. If the page is not removed, I will link to this page and remove the Ezio content from the Gemalto page. 2)as part of an effort to tidy up the Todos page after the company was bought by Gemalto. My thought was to make the Todos page a brief history of the company prior to acquisition and then link to this page (to show where the technology went) and to the Gemalto page (to show the new ownership of the company). 3) If you search for Ezio you get a disambiguation page with Ezio from Gemalto on it but no link (I added the link today) so I guess there is some need for some additional explanation. 4) Ezio is notable because of it's Gemalto ownership, Todos heritage, as an example of multi-factor security and because it is very widely used by millions of customers and hundreds of banks. I intended to expand on this page and add further links and third-party sources as well as adding the links to the other pages. However, if the page is about to be instantly deleted there's not much point putting in the work. I'm willing to put in the time to complete these tasks but I'd welcome guidance and feedback from whoever marked this page for speedy deletion or other editors about whether it is worthwhile or if there is a better way forward. Totziens (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)