Talk:F-41 (Michigan county highway)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was page moved. Of course, be sure to implement the changes. @harej 00:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

M-171 (Michigan highway) → F-41 (Michigan county highway) &mdash; The highway's current designation is F-41. While county routes aren't usually notable enough for their own articles, this one seems to have enough of a history to warrant a standalone article, given that it was once a portion of US-23 and later had its own state highway designation for quite some time. An article on F-41 can cover its history as US-23 and as M-171 all in one place instead of the M-171 history being on one page, and the F-41 history on the list of county routes in Michigan. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not normally in favor of state highway designations redirecting to articles on other subjects. That's why the article title is M-102, not 8 Mile Road. I can support this merger/rename/move if it's done right. Mostly, it would just need the infobox shield flipped, some history added post 1970 for the F-41 designation and additional bolding added. I think we could do this article justice in that regard, and the M-171 title would still direct here. I can go for this. When do we implement it? Imzadi1979 (talk) 05:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. I mocked up a version of the article at User:Imzadi1979/Sandbox2 It's still rough, but I think it's a start to what could/should be done if this proposed rename/move is implemented. Imzadi1979 (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That works. I would support that form. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Support — Seems like a reasonable proposal, and the two of you at least appear to be interested enough to actually implement the changes that a name change would call for. — V = I * R  (talk) 01:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.