Talk:F. D. Maurice

Work needed
I took a whack at this poor article this morning, Maurice's feast day among Episcopalians. Frankly, I still know little about him other than the apparent polarization between his followers and detractors, but at least separated out some of the legacy stuff that had been interspersed. Since my time is limited, I suggest someone who knows something about him take a stab at this article.Jweaver28 (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Explain my revisions
Problems 1. Citations needed. Article was tagged twice “This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2014)” and five inline “citation needed” tags and two sections with no citations. 2. Plagiarism. I found that the article contained blocks of material copied verbatim from uncited sources without quotation marks. 3. Article contained dead and false links. 4. Article was inadequate coverage of Maurice based on too few sources My revisions 1. Found citations to reliable sources and added them 2. Kept much of the old text, but revised and expanded it based on reliable sources 3. Revised some section titles for better fit with reliable sources and content 4. Did revision one section at a time by cutting the old text and pasting revised text Vejlefjord (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)