Talk:F/8 and be there/Archive 1

GA Review: Quick-Failed due to major structural problems
It appears this article was lightly adapted from the notes on a powerpoint presentation.

The first big problem is that this article, which is about a professional idiom, does not explain the idiom in the intro of the article. I can see why you would do this at the start of a speech to string the audience along, but it's not appropriate for an encyclopedia page.

The explanation of why "f/8" is used in the idiom is not really given until Specs, which is nearly at the end. Also, "Specs" shouldn't be one of the article headings. Neither should Cultural Touchstone. The entire structure of the article is meandering and counterintuitive. The current information could be presented with only 2 body sections, one for all the information about the phrase's historical origin and a second for the information about the associated philosophy, and the result would be much clearer.

Due to the major rearrangements and likely rewriting necessary to make the article into flowing prose rather than a set of chopped-up blurbs, I'm spot-failing this. Don't be afraid to put it back up for review once it's fixed though, it looks like the informational content is already present for a short but complete page. --erachima talk 11:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)