Talk:FAA Order 8100.15

Contested deletion
This redirect should not be speedy deleted as an implausible typo or misnomer, because... (your reason here) --IveGoneAway (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification that I am preparing to contest the nomination. IveGoneAway (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , I take it you've noticed that "Order" is repeated twice in this title? I don't see any incidence of that misnomer occurring online or in academic literature. signed,Rosguill talk 18:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I would propose a move to a valid FAA Order 8100.15 redirect rather than deletion (to save a step). IveGoneAway (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

This redirect should not be speedy deleted as an implausible typo or misnomer, because it should be moved to FAA Order 8100.15 rather than deleted. It is a typo, but a valid redirect, nevertheless, presuming the move. The mistake was on my part, and I appreciate the notification of correction.

A conventional means of referencing FAA Orders and Notices is formulated as
 * FAA Order ####.## or FAA Notice ####.##

The pages for FAA Orders and Notices follow this convention.
 * FAA Notice 8000.372
 * FAA Order 7110.65
 * FAA Order 8100.8
 * FAA Order 8110.37 ( soon to be resubmitted from draftification)
 * FAA Order 8110.105
 * FAA Order 8130.34

FAA Order 8100.15 is a particular situation, as a page was created for the subject of the Order, ODAs, without reference to the Order that established it.
 * Rather than creating a separate stub for FAA Order 8100.15, I "preemptively merged" any potential article about the Order with the existing page about the subject of the order. You will note that the Order 8110.15 was already embedded in the page before I made the redirect.

And as to the possible argument of "implausible search term", FAA Orders and Notices are also commonly referred to by their numerals alone, and FAA Order and Notice pages can be effectively search for by their numerals. A search for 8100.15 will hit FAA Order 8100.15.

IveGoneAway (talk) 18:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 19:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I've gone ahead and moved the page, so we're good to go. Thanks for the clarification. signed,Rosguill talk 19:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)