Talk:FC Groningen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk · contribs) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be picking this one up. Hopefully this becomes a good article! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Language and Grammar looks good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Good enough.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It is a proffesional football club, and has plenty of data on it. This is a pass.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Nominator is neutural to the subject, and no signs of bias are being shown in the article.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images look good
 * 1) Overall: Article looks great, so I will be passing it! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: