Talk:FEDIMA

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it's about a notable trade organization and contains no POVy treatment. Seriously, what reason is there to delete it? --— LlywelynII  11:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Fwiw, I'm not sure why my rationale is the only one listed here. As this article meets no criteria of wp:promotion (I'm completely uninvolved (I added the stub b/c of articles citing Fedima w/o there being an entry for it yet); there are 3d party cites; this is a 40-yr-old trade union for an entire sector of the European economy and not a "garage company"), surely the nominator needs to come up with a better argument for the speedy deletion. — LlywelynII  11:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have declined the speedy deletion request as the article obviously doesn't fulfil the G11 criterion. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 11:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Skål! — LlywelynII  11:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)