Talk:FIFA Club of the Century

The ranking
According the ranking PDF's archive, this ranking was based for a votes by the FIFA Magazine's readers. For that a club with few international titles like MU was ranked 2nd and other clubs with great honours like Juve or Peñarol after the 5th position. --Dantetheperuvian (talk) 21:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Something is wrong here
In the list, Barça appears in the third position, while in the .pdf link you can see Bayern ahead of Barcelona in the third place. Then you have Santos ahead of Ajax and in the page you see Ajax before Santos. Am I missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.34.13 (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ fixed.--KSAconnect 13:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Intro needed
This article needs a better intro to explain what these rankings represent. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 02:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2016
Botafogo is mentioned two times in the list.

AlexanderSanz (talk) 03:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 08:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on FIFA Club of the Century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807051427/http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/stadiums/stadium=456/detail.html to http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/stadiums/stadium=456/detail.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050120112217/http://www.rte.ie:80/sport/2000/1212/zidanez.html to http://www.rte.ie/sport/2000/1212/zidanez.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)