Talk:FNA mapping

Style
Wikipedia does not write subject heads in ALL CAPS. These should be changed to sentence case per the relevant style guide. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Boy am I confused! First, the only part of the subject head is "FNA" - which stands for Fine Needle Aspiration. But no one refers to it that way. I would be happy to rewrite as "Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Mapping" if that makes you happy - but I actually think it is found more easily as FNA Mapping. That is the higher volumeof search on Google.

Second, why in heck is this a "C" quality. Several physicians reviewed this article and thought it was excellent. IK can't imagine they are way off base on that relative to Wikipedia. Please be more specific to me about what I need to do to get this to whatever is the highest level needed and I will rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onlinematters (talk • contribs) 14:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Merge to FNA
Has been proposed (not by me)
 * Support this article is primarily about FNA, and there is a large amount of duplication between the two articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Support --Kkmurray (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose - the FNA Mapping article focusses on a very specific application of fine-need aspiration for the assessment of male infertility. This is a distinctly notable technique, as the extensive referencing demonstrates. The key problem is that the lede doesn't start by defining the topic, but rather gives a background to FNA. I'll change the order of the lede to better reflect the contents of the article. Klbrain (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Closing, given the lack of consensus over almost 2 years. Klbrain (talk) 16:36, 28 February 2018 (UTC)