Talk:FN Five-seven/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments
The 5.7x28mm cartridges are color coded for easy identification. The color codes and differences between the cartridges are explained in greater detail in the 5.7x28mm article, but it probably wouldn't be appropriate to expand on that information in the gun's article. ROG5728 (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * True, but an expansion of the caption wouldn't be out of line if you can keep it short, because I'm not the only guy who's going to have that question.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I went back and expanded the caption with some extra information. ROG5728 (talk) 07:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Good enough.