Talk:FRANK (drugs)

The site "lacks clear information"? That's a blatant NPOV violation.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 23:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Agreed this is entirely one sided, the website is an anti-drugs site run by the government which only presents one side of the argument. Not a Pro-Drug perosn myself but this needs tidying 86.2.98.42 (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Critisism needs references
Will look around for any references on the web for this section...as it stands it could just be read as opinion.TheHappyTurtle (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Just added an extra sentence, also noticed a critical comment reference at bottom of page so withdraw earlier commentTheHappyTurtle (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I have just pulled some parts of the criticism section. They have been tagged as requiring citations for long enough IMHO. I can find no basis for truth. I invite someone to reinsert them if they can provide citations! Dvmedis (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, about time. People adding criticism to this article should note that it must be sourced from reliable sources. The most reliable source of criticism I've seen is this article, which actually supports some of the comments which have just been removed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. 80.193.49.190 (talk) 23:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on FRANK (drugs). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604060405/http://www.talktofrank.com:80/section.aspx?id=110 to http://www.talktofrank.com/section.aspx?ID=110
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080209140008/http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk:80/publication-search/frank/FRANKReview2004-2006 to http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/publication-search/frank/FRANKReview2004-2006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on FRANK (drugs). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100317193404/http://www.youtube.com/user/FRANKCocaine to https://www.youtube.com/user/FRANKCocaine
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.talktofrank.com/section.aspx?ID%3D110
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725063438/http://www.drugeducationforum.com/index.cfm?PageURL=blog&ArticleID=7571&ArticleMonth= to http://www.drugeducationforum.com/index.cfm?PageURL=blog&ArticleID=7571&ArticleMonth=
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://drugs.homeoffice.gov.uk/publication-search/frank/FRANKReview2004-2006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

"Propaganda"
Someone added the word "Propaganda" - "FRANK is a national drug education propaganda service jointly established by" I removed it. Aquataris (talk) 20:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)