Talk:FTP Voyager


 * == Deletion ==

Why has this page been nominated for deletion? No reason was given except something vague about non notable. Surely it's been notable enough for this article to be created, maintained, and slowly improved. If it weren't notable, doesn't that mean no one would bother editing it? —fudoreaper (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The only sources listed in the article are primary sources related to the program, and a supposed entity which gave the program an award. The sharewareindustryawards.com link is taken over by spammers now - it might've been live at some point, I guess. Google searches return little beyond routine reviews, primary sources and mentions in guides. The article itself seems to be mostly a feature list and doesn't assert why the piece of software is important. Feel free to remove the prod, although I'll probably AfD it (which is a venue better suited for this discussion, anyway).  — daranz [ t ] 08:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Can't the software be notable just because it exists? What about this article bothers you enough to take the effort to delete it? Can't it just quietly exist? —fudoreaper (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FTP Voyager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090409015833/http://www.sharewareindustryawards.com/sia.php to http://www.sharewareindustryawards.com/sia.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)