Talk:Faber Finds

Independently notable?
I'd suggest that this information be merged to Faber and Faber. There seems no need for a stand-alone article; the publisher's article isn't that long, and the various imprints can be discussed there. Deor (talk) 10:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Agreed Half Price (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree.Komowkwa (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Since no one has objected in eight months, I'm going to implement the merge. Deor (talk) 17:17, 4 March 2010 (UTC)