Talk:Fabian Cancellara/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MadGeographer (talk · contribs) 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a very good (and detailed) article. yeah your first ork. and if there are any questions, just write to presse(at)infrontringier.ch. this article is ridiculous. cancelara is obvious part of...ahwww ya know what. i go to sleep. at last - he´ll be armstronged. if not, he´ll pantani himself :D. bye 217.191.51.229 (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * Appropriate use with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I think you've done a great job here! Note: this is my first GA review, so in case I missed something, additional comments are welcome (although I really don't see anything now that could prevent this article from being listed at GA). mge o  talk 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)