Talk:Fabian Cowper

deletion?
Hi, thanks for the message regarding potential deletion. I am aware that I have used the cited text as a template, but I intend over the next couple of days to use it as no more than a basis and to edit the Wiki page substantially - and to introduce other sources - so that it becomes very much its own text. Thanks for your patience.

Hi again, the page has now been substantially edited. More work still in progress. Thanks. Gervius; —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gervius (talk • contribs) 15:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggest the most urgent issue is reliable sources (please follow that link for details of what exactly is being suggested). Right now, there is no way for anyone to verify any of the assertions that are made in the body of the article, and there are issues with neutrality.  Accounting4Taste: talk 16:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that better sourcing is needed, but that is not relevant to the speedy deletion, which I have declined since the author is working in good faith to remove any copyvios. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)