Talk:Fable (2004 video game)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080417112438/http://www.computerandvideogames.com:80/article.php?id=90363 to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=90363

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 one external links on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/previews/fable_3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140822065548/http://www.robosoftin.com:80/what-we-do to http://www.robosoftin.com/what-we-do#portfolio/mac
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202203820/http://pixelvolt.com/2014/02/02/dont-overlook-fable-anniversary/ to http://pixelvolt.com/2014/02/02/dont-overlook-fable-anniversary/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/fable
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://uk.xbox.gamespy.com/xbox/fable/546898p1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912033633/http://www.metacritic.com:80/games/platforms/xbx/fable?q=fable to http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fable?q=fable
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725052750/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fablethelostchapters/review.html to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fablethelostchapters/review.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/previews/fable-lost-chapters_7
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205234953/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6111138.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6111138.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203141853/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6121637.html?tag=result;title;1 to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6121637.html?tag=result;title;1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081025182027/http://www.music4games.net/Features_Display.aspx?id=17 to http://www.music4games.net/Features_Display.aspx?id=17
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081024195656/http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fablethelostchapters?q=fable to http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fablethelostchapters?q=Fable

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 7 January 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed. The confusion with the 1996 video game is too great. ToThAc (talk) 18:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Fable (video game) → Fable (2004 video game) – To disambiguate the title from Fable (1996 video game). The leftover redirect, Fable (video game), would then be retargeted to Fable (disambiguation). Steel1943 (talk) 04:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * er, support obviously, but per WP:MOVE why bring to RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * There's a possible reason to oppose this move, but I'm not sure if I feel like putting beans up my nose. Steel1943  (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * - :P In ictu oculi (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Support of course, and I'm the last guy who'll tell you to skip RMs :p Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Support Non controversial move though.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Support. The RM was a good idea considering the nonsense surrounding similarly named articles that somehow have "primary" disambiguators. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Conflicting information
This New York Times article mentions the development time was three years and involved 80 people. While here it's mentioned 4 years and 70 people. Which source should we use here? Timur9008 (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Given they're from the same vintage and they're both mainstream publications, I wouldn't really privilege one over the other, especially since, especially for the time frame, they could be counting prototypes and the like in one count, but not the other. I think best choice here is include the range in the prose (70–80 people or 'roughly 80 people') or include the discrepancy in a efn for max clarity. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 17:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Timur9008 (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)