Talk:Faidherbia/Archive 1

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Faidherbia albida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928031700/http://www.worldagroforestry.org/Sites/TreeDBS/aft/speciesPrinterFriendly.asp?Id=1 to http://www.worldagroforestry.org/Sites/TreeDBS/aft/speciesPrinterFriendly.asp?Id=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Moved to genus
Following usual practice, the article on this monotypic genus is now at the genus-name title. The edit history of the article formerly at that title is now at Faidherbia (genus). --Stemonitis (talk) 07:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Faidherbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151110064020/http://waynesword.palomar.edu:80/plaug99.htm to http://waynesword.palomar.edu/plaug99.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Faidherbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://waynesword.palomar.edu/plaug99.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926230106/http://www.ville-ge.ch/cjb/bd/africa/details.php?langue=an&id=62154 to http://www.ville-ge.ch/cjb/bd/africa/details.php?langue=an&id=62154
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809102647/http://www.afae.org/html/98-204.html to http://www.afae.org/html/98-204.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Link missing
This monotypic article should be linked to "Anabaum" in Wikipedia.de (German Wikipedia), but the software does not alloow me to do so. Can anybody help? --Himbear (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * this is a problem in Wikidata. Wikidata has two items: for the species and  for the genus. Wikipedias that have only one article for the monospecific genus can only link to one of these – this is, in my view, an error in the design of taxon items in Wikidata. The English Wikipedia has been linked to  – sensible because in the English article's title is the genus name. The German Wikipedia has been linked to  – sensible because the German article's title is the German name of the species. However, this means that they don't link to each other. There appears to be no good way to fix this. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the answer, which I had already guessed. What I want is a correction of the misbehavior what you as well characterize an error in the behavior of Wikidata here.--Himbear (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * there's nothing we can do here. It's a problem for editors at Wikidata to fix, but I don't think there's any interest there. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for trying to answer. I got your message, this is the wrong forum.--Himbear (talk) 20:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Regional names
I disagree with Declangi's removal of this info. WP:PLANTS is ambiguous. There are many good reasons why local names of species may be useful. For one, it would have told me that the Gaurdian's use of "Gao Tree" as an English common name was an innovation of the journalist involved. Thus I am moving this info here. Declangi is right everything should be sourced correctly. This is likely all from the World Agroforestry website.Leo Breman (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)