Talk:Faile (artist collective)

Career section is extremely un-encyclopedic
The career section should likely be reduced to 10% of its current length, and cleaned up significantly to be something resembling encyclopedic. It is currently a gushing word salad of art critique, not encyclopedic information. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Intro reads like an advertisement
I have replaced the advert template, as the introduction is gushing, subjective, and very clearly written like an advertisement. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

GA fail
I have failed this article, mostly because of several issues with references:


 * Reliability and problems
 * I am not entirely sure if these references are to be trusted, they seem to be unreliable; one of the html links doesn't seem to be functional, another doesn't seem to atcually give any information... the problems go on


 * Number
 * There are only 5 references, and, as pointed out above, many are corrupted in their html format, unreliable, and non-informative.


 * Unsourced claims
 * ...pepper the article. Get some references for these claims. I will attempt to put fact tags on the statements that need references especially.

Good luck in your improvements to the article. If there are any questions, they should be directed to my talk page. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 08:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Please note also that a general cleanup of prose and the article in general would certainly not go amiss. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 08:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)