Talk:Fairway Shops/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bungle (talk · contribs) 22:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

This is not to GA standard. Some thoughts below.

I can't find any issues of concern with the prose, but then there is barely anything noteworthy to read. The lead is under the usual expected size for shopping malls/shop groups, the history essentially consists of a single sentence and the article doesn't present any information that in my view makes it worthy of even being an article.

This is likely falling into the stub category and stubs cannot be good articles. This also seems to be a case of WP:MILL with no notability established; it's just a group of several shops, essentially a list that has been written into 2 paragraphs (though admittedly, reasonably well written). The author may well think this is worthy of an article, but if it is then there is nothing that justifies this argument at this present time. There are a fair number of shopping mall/centre articles on WP, with many of them stubs or lists but to my knowledge these ones are not hoping to achieve GA recognition in their respective states. Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)