Talk:Fairy/Archive 2

About the fairies in cartoons
Do you think it would be wise to do an article about fairies in cartoons? many children are learning various factors about these in modern cartoons more than legends, most of the time are drawn with no humanoid forms and have a kind of codependency with humans. A new type of fairies on my point of view. --DFTDER (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Also, what is the difference between a fairy, a sprite, and a pixie? For example: Spryte from The Legend of Zelda is often called a fairy...but the name would suggest she is more properly a sprite. Are the two interchangeable? Is it a slur to call a fairy a pixie? Like, all Koreans are Asians, but not all Asians are Korean? --The_Iconoclast (talk) 08:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

fey and fay
The main article seems to be accurate on the terms fay and fey. My 1971 OED contains no examples of "fay" being used an a variant of "fey" meaning doomed. People involved with the traditions knew both these words and understood the difference - the tendency to use "fey" as a plural or collective of "fays" seems to have developed in the 1980s in fantasy novels. Any additional data on this would be appreciated. 212.159.59.41 (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Is the picture really appropriate?
Given that this article spends most of its length explaining how people feared and mistrusted fairies and viewed them as fickle at best and malevolent at worst, is an image of one of those Victorian twee fairies really representative of what this article is trying to say?  Serendi pod ous  20:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

The article is confused about its own scope, and is justly tagged for rewriting. It should make up its mind first whether it wants to be the actual fairies of (more or less) Victorian era Romanticism, or if it wants to be a comparative study on folk beliefs throughout Western Europe. The two topics certainly overlap, and influences go both ways, but they surely aren't the same topic. Category:Fairies conflates all possible and impossible sprites, hobgoblins, water-spirits and what have you from the world over. This isn't a fruitful approach. Just like Supernatural beings in Slavic folklore (the article is bad, but its scope is useful and conductive to improvement), there can be a similar overview page for other "folklores" (Welsh, Gaelic, English, French, etc.). The folkloristic beliefs are in mischievous or even dangerous, poorly-defined and rarely-seen "creatures". The Romantic stories, ultimately inspired by the medieval "Romances" (hence "Romantic") cast this into tales of dream-like enchantment and magic. "Fairy" is an extremely difficult term to work with, as it can mean anything or nothing. Perhaps WP:SS would be the best approach, just laying out the situation in overview and referring to more clearly defined sub-topics discussed on separate pages.

The first thing to make clear is that this topic is entirely modern. Medieval romance, Celtic mythology and what have you can be discussed as possible contributing factors under an "Origins" header, but the "fairies" did not evolve prior to the 16th to 17th century, and are thus by their nature a product of the Early Modern period. This fact gives them their character, and it only distracts from the core of the topic to discuss "Slavic fairies" or "African fairies" or "Japanese fairies". Comparative folklore is a good thing, but it needs to be contained to discussions that are explicitly comparative, instead of the natural entropic tendency of Wikipedia to devolve into unordered "lists" of random or loosely related terms and concepts. --dab (𒁳) 08:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Slated Rewrite
As noted in various places above, this article is a big problem. The word fairy is a big problem, before this article can get anywhere, exactly what fairy means and what it meant needs to be handled in depth. Here is, for example, a good place to start: Hunting down similar approaches will solve the issue with this article. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Williams, Noel. 1996. "The Semantics of the Word Fairy: Making Meaning Out of Thin Air" in Narváez, Peter (ed.) The Good People: New Fairylore Essays. University Press of Kentucky.

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014
In 1932, the famous American writer H.-P. Lovecraft has written a short text about this thesis of Fairies as hidden people : "Some backgrounds of Fairyland" (Finally published in 1944 into "Marginalia").

82.64.194.141 (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Not done. Can you kindly present reliable references for this information? Fiction descriptions may be included. --PeaceNT (talk) 23:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Anteros and the modern representative of fairies
I was wondering, does anyone know if there is an connection between Anteros, the greek god of requited love, and the modern representations of fairies with butterfly wings, given he was represented as such some time before them? 180.181.125.107 (talk) 06:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2014
Please add a cross-wiki link to the corresponding Greek article Νεράιδες across all languages.
 * Yes check.svg Done (via Wikidata) Thanks. ···V ani s che nu (mc/talk) 23:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 July 2014
Fairy's are real

72.24.50.34 (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

repeated sentences?
In the Description and the Characteristics, there's a few sentences with the same references that are completely repeated? Is this necessary? Almost the whole 1st paragraph in the Characteristics section is a copy of the 3rd and last paragraph from Description, sans the last sentence, and the next paragraph starts with yet another copied sentence. The paragraph after the quotation is again started with a sentence copied word by word(except for the tag removed). —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk 02:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Fairies: Real or Not Real?
Are Fairies real? A fairy (also fay, fae; from faery, faerie, "realm of the fays") is a type of mythical being or legendary creature in European folklore, a form of spirit, often described as metaphysical, supernatural or preternatural. There is proof that they don't exist though. There has been many people that have said they have seen fairies, e.g. there is proof they might exist in Ireland: The area around the hill of Tara is known to be a dwelling place of fairies. For years now, attempts have been made to build motorways over this land. Strange things happen to those involved in the projects, and the projects fail. They were warned by pagans that the area was a fairy place, and that bad things would happen if they messed with it, but they didn't listen because "fairies are not real." So... people who say fairies aren't real think again, because if you haven't seen a fairy, you cannot prove they don't exist, but you can prove they do exist because there are many stories about people seeing fairies, its not just in myths and legends.. they might possibly exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CutieCatz (talk • contribs) 20:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

what fairys eat

fairys eat magical pixi dust that goes into their body and doesnt come out. This is a clever thing because the tooth fairy never needs to use your personal toilet. That is one of the secrets of the fairys so you dont wake up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.160.82 (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2015
In the sentence
 * It was suggested, that newcomers drove out the original inhabitants, and the memories of this defeated, hidden people developed into the fairy beliefs we have today.

could somebody remove the spurious comma before "that"? (See the overview of English relative clauses, particularly point 4 that "[in] formal English, 'that' … is not preceded by a comma.") Thanks! 75.117.132.253 (talk) 03:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Stickee (talk) 03:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Suggested edit In the "Hidden People" section on January 26, 2016
Sentence as is: Proponents of this theory claimed to find support in the tradition that of cold iron as a charm against the fairies, which was viewed as a cultural memory of invaders with iron weapons displacing inhabitants had only flint and were therefore easily defeated.

This sentence stopped me because of its awkwardness. After a read or two, I mentally rewrote it so that it would make sense to me.

Suggested edit: Proponents of this theory claimed to find support in the tradition of using cold iron as a charm against fairies, which was viewed as a cultural memory of invaders with iron weapons displacing inhabitants who had only flint and were therefore easily defeated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by This Ole Miss (talk • contribs) 14:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Types of fairies
Made redirect of Types of fairies&mdash;if anyone wants to recreate it and expand, total content was: "there are many diffrent types of fairies. including the sand man, the tooth fairy, pixies, sprites, water fairies, brownies,etc. the sand man puts kids to sleep. the tooth fairy takes kid's teeth and gives them money." -DialUp 05:28, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

About "Faery" as the place where fairies live: Tolkien talks about this a little in an essay somewhere; I think it's called "On Fairy Tales." Sorry I don't have access to the book where I read this at the moment.

It is actually called "On Fairy Stories" and it's an essay, but the book it resides in now is called Tales of the Perilous Realm. Only scholars of folklore and fairies really use the term Faerie as the Otherworld where they reside, and some well-researched authors. It is a very esoteric term.-jensketch —Preceding undated comment added 19:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Demoted Pagan Deities
The article seems to state that the Victorian view that fairies were originally pagan gods, has been conclusively debunked. However it only states this and makes no attempt to back this claim up with evidence. I know practically nothing about this topic, but I think that if you are to single out this theory among many, as debunked, it needs to be backed up not only by a source, but by reasons as to why. If no one has any particular reasons, would it be better just to say that the view has fallen out of favour with current scholars, rather than make authoritative statements on its veracity?Jaxcab (talk) 06:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Etymology (again)
Right. So far there have been several people who have posited their personal theories on a proper etymology for the term 'fairy' that differs from the one posited in the article. I'm not going to add to that. But I do notice that the Etymology section has had a request for verification through further citations for over two years now and none have been forthcoming. Not to mention that the single citation used to support the section doesn't actually support all the claims made in the section. (It doesn't help that in his original text Keightley acknowledges several of the possible etymologies suggested on this talk page as the prevailing scholarly opinions of his time and then proffers his own preferred etymology as a dissension and that whoever added the current citation seems to have elected to cite a secondary source rather than the original text for the specific purpose of allowing only their own preferred etymology)

So my recommendation is that the Etymology section of this article be removed unless someone can provide proper sources and citation.

Thoughts?

Robrecht (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Origins?
The section on Origins is vague on two key issues: Which cultures and peoples have long standing belief in faeries, and when these beliefs were held. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ve2jgs (talk • contribs) 11:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Western Europe.
 * This was put into the lede because otherwise it would have to repeated over and over and over and over again in every single section of the article. We explain up front that fairies are a piece of Western European folklore and then go on to explain what the folklore is.  Goldfritha 16:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I feel like the origin page takes a sort of harsh tone, and ends up not giving as much information as might be helpful/isn't laid out very well. As an example when it says "This entire Victorian view has been debunked and refuted and is now considered by scholars an antiquated and incorrect view." under 'Demoted pagan deities' that's not exactly helpful (aside from debunked and refuted being redundant) it would be nice to know why it is not considered reliable. Also overall it's hard to tell whether the subheadings in this section are meant to be examples possible origin theory throughout time, or all incorrect ideas, it might be better if they were broken up into separate categories based on whether they are known to be false, or not. DwarvenSteel (talk) 11:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Cajun Fairies
Does anyone know if these beings are called fairies, or a term related to it in etymology? Goldfritha 22:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Legend has it in the Cajun culture, that the Feufollet is known as a Cajun Fairy. Feufollet means foolish fire. In the swamps, there was seen shooting balls of fire which the natives had no explanation of the fire. The legend was told to https://www.facebook.com/marylynn.plaisance Mary Lynn Plaisance by an elderly local who said he saw the fire and explained that it was the soul of a baby who was not baptized before it died. Plaisance proceeded to write about the https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cajun-Fairies-In-the-Land-of-Sha-Bebe/318924068226461?hc_location=ufi Cajun Fairies in her chronicles of the magical land of Sha Bebe.08:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)08:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)08:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)~

Protective charms unsourced claim
In the Protective charms section I've tagged a claim about summoning with citation needed. The claim was added in 2007 by a user with only one contribution here. A quick google scholar search for freely accessible sources on fairy summoning did not yield any supporting results. -84user (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Depictions of fairies in popular culture
This article doesn't mention much how fairies are depicted in popular culture - beautiful, usually dressed in light pink outfits, and generally not demonic unlike old mythology. I think this should be mentioned in the article in a section. ANDROS1337 TALK 08:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Pagan deities
"Many of the Irish tales of the Tuatha Dé Danann refer to these beings as fairies, though in more ancient times they were regarded as Goddesses and Gods." This needs citation. I would have added a "citation required" tag, but the page is locked. CuAnnan (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I shall add it for you. There is a lot of unsourced material, a lot of it nonsense, in this article. The above is nonsense anyway as the word "fairy" isn't Gaelic. Translations of Irish tales may use "fairy" but it isn't in the originals. Sigurd Dragon Slayer (talk) 17:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about something like this ? --Tsaag Valren (talk) 11:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

The article states, "Another incorrect theory is that the fairies were originally worshiped as minor goddesses". My concerns: 1) "Another"? Perhaps the writer intended "incorrect" to be braced by a pair of commas? 2) Certainly not ALL fairies would be demoted deities, but if there's good evidence to say that NONE of them were, there should be, at least, a citation. Valerie voigt (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)valerie_voigt

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fairy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061111095722/http://www.endicott-studio.com/gal/galvctf.html to http://www.endicott-studio.com/gal/galvctf.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Peri, Persian Fairies.
I read in the encyclopedia of magical creatures that all of the Peri were captured and placed in cages. Others brought them incense because they were forbidden food and drink. These were the first investigators into Hellish affairs. Dragons we're sent to save them but were chained up. I went with my dragon Orion, to investigate. I saw this in visions of my memories. We sat in hell for ages making good deals and trying to pinpoint the source of all vileness. Now, my fairy was the last saved besides Pairakas. The vile fairies made deals with Jeh, the ill sex goddess. This lifetime my mission was to overthrow just Jeh. But we work so fast that we also got the Angra Mainyu, Jeh's lover, YHWH, Jesus, Ashema, and finally Vizarsh. Pretty fine work fore and all my team. That's why I always spend time recruiting people by developing friendship bonds. Rcschumacher (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Problem paragraphs in the article?
Can someone explain what these 4 paragraphs are doing?

A common misconception is that faires are mammals. In fact, faries belong to the insect group Maschitics Fairus, where it is believed the modern day corruption 'fairy' originated. Fairies procreate only on a full moon. The male fairy secretes a sticky pus like substance over an organic receptor, a tree log or other such appropriate natural object. Female fairies are attracted by the scent and can detect the male secreation from a radius of 20 miles using thier powerful, magical, sense of smell. Afer a gestation period of several weeks, the female must retreat to a safe area to lay her eggs. Often a hollowed out tree bark is padded with leaves and twigs, carefully sewed using a miniture rowenta machine. The female remains with the eggs until hatched.

Females may occassionally kill and eat a male after mating but this is more the exception than the rule. The young fairies are colored orange and white when they emerge 1 to 4 weeks later. The female faries may live for more than a year and a half. Growth requires 2 to 4 months, depending on availability of prey during which the females molt 6 to 8 times and the males 3 to 6 times.

Newly hatched fairies are predominately white or yellowish-white, gradually acquiring more black and varying amounts of red and white with each molt. Juveniles of both sexes resemble the male and are harmless.

Faries were worshipped heavily during the latter 16th to early 17th century, however, wizards discoverd in 1623 that fairies could be used in various creams as an active ingredient to stimulate growth. Subsequent popularity of these over the counter creams led to them being hunted to extinction. Generations later, the only evidence we have that the ever existed is in rare fossil stones.

It looks like someone tried to put some "realistic biological information" into this, but I don't suspect it can be back up with any actual research :-).


 * These paras look all wrong to me. I'm removing them "until someone can provide verification that it is correct"! -- SGBailey 12:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's entirely fictional, written by J.K. Rowling in her companion book for The Harry Potter books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iclavdivs (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Fairies should never be worshipped. All familiars are Spiritus Familiars, serving beings. Angels are not allowed to be worshipped. Mithra and the other God's and demigods are worshipped. We called the Amesha Spentas archangels and the lesser deities angels in order to protect our books. This was to save what wasn't lost in the fires of Alexandria. Michael was put in charge of El's forces. But we let him watch so the war wouldn't go too long. Raphael and Uriel the same. Only Gabriel caved and became first an agitator then foul trickster. Ahura Mazda foresaw this whole mess. So he placed people in nations hoping they would one day settle their differences. America, Canada, and Australia were these political experiments. Problems still exist but I hope we can bond together as a world. The world courts are there in case we cannot develop good government. Rcschumacher (talk) 18:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2018
Waif88 (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Please update the reading list to include: Young, S. and Houlbrook, C. (eds.) Magical Folk: British and Irish Fairies 500 AD to the Present (London, 2018). https://www.amazon.co.uk/Magical-Folk-British-Fairies-Present/dp/1783341017 This is one of the most up-to-date pieces of scholarship on British fairies.
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: The"bibliography" section is not a general reading list, it is the sources used to create the article. if there is content in this book that is not duplicative of current content and should be added, then that content should be cited correctly and the book can  be added.   Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2018
The entire sentence before Citation 22 seems highly subjective and the entire sentence should probably be cut. The wording is very emotionally charged and it just seems unnecessary.

Cut sentence entirely: "This entire Victorian view has been debunked and refuted and is now considered by scholars an antiquated and incorrect view.[22]" Polymphus (talk) 18:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Not only that, but it fails reliable sourcing by being cited to nothing more than an Amazon book listing.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Welsh
change ((Welsh)) to ((Welsh people|Welsh))
 * Yes check.svg Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Cottingley Fairies
Should there be a mention of this famous Hoax? For info, see http://www.randi.org/library/cottingley/ 203.45.15.218 05:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The "mention" of this hoax is now the exact same, fairly long text as in the article itself. Switch it to a simple mention, with perhaps a quick summary, and a link to the article. Kilyle 20:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Um, I've just seen that someone's gone and written nonsense all over the page. I'm not sure what was there in the first place, and also I'm not exactly sure which parts are made up and which aren't. Some are pretty obvious, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.175.39 (talk) 06:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I just finished paring this down and rewording; moved into Demoted Angels as minor bit regarding Theosophical 'angelic' entities. -- Hogwaump (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Fairy vs. Pari
Aren't the Germanic/Anglo-Saxon "fairies" derived from Old-Persian/Zoroastrian "Peris"?! Or maybe they have the same Indo-European root?! Peris also exist in ancient Indian/Sanskrit mythology (परी) and have exactly the same meaning and function as ancient Persian and Germanic "fairies"/"peris". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.130.37 (talk)
 * As I recall, the word "faery" is a collective noun, like "citizenry" or "soldiery". The proper singular form of "faery" is "fae." The term isn't Germanic in origin, but Latin, and is derived from the word "fata", which means "fate". The Fata were originally the Moirae, the fates who decided the path of one's life. If the Latin word "fata" comes from the same Indo-European root as "peri" (which is possible) then yes they could be related.  Serendi pod  ous  12:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Question from anonymous: Then why NO mention of Persian fairies "Pari"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.218.255.223 (talk) 14:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

There is now a reference, with link to article "Pari", in the Demoted Angels section. -- Hogwaump (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguate "Irish"
change Irish to Irish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:541:4500:1760:218:8bff:fe74:fe (talk) 17:50, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done (diff). Thanks for noticing.  Rebb  ing

Origin
Aren't Fairies originally from the Persian Peri. That's common knowledge and I'm shocked that only a later cultural version is credited for the origins. Shadzad (talk) 04:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * No, it's pretty clear that the term derives from the Old French fae, which comes from Latin fata "fates". Peri, on the other hand, derives from Avestan pairikā "witch". So, the similar appearance to peri is merely coincidence. Whateley23 (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect citation in Note 14
Note 14 cites C.S. Lewis' book The Discarded Image, but for some reason puts it down as The Discarded File. No such book exists. Please update the citation from "Lewis, C. S. (1994). The Discarded File: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Cambridge University Press. p. 122." to "Lewis, C. S. (1994). The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Cambridge University Press. p. 122." 76.178.137.211 (talk) 03:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done with thanks, NiciVampireHeart 03:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Some proposed changes
Information to be added or removed: a change in "in art" paragraph. I would like to add the illustrator "Swonild Ilenia Genovese" Explanation of issue: the author has produced two illustrated books entirely dedicated to fairies called "AcquaBosco fairies" References supporting change: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=acquabosco&ref=nb_sb_noss 93.48.88.79 (talk) 09:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Not done, they don't appear notable enough for inclusion here. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Deragatory slang
A discussion in the WikiFairy talk page inadvertantly brought up an interesting point... why is there no mention in this article of the fact that the word "fairy" has been used as a derogatory term for homosexual men? I don't condone the use of insults and such, but since Wikipedia is concerned with reporting facts and cultural situations, it would seem to make sense to include a bit of background information, specifically when the slang term first came into common use and possible explanations of the origin. - Ugliness Man 11:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Cite some reliable sources and we will. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 05:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

How about: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/fairy - there are other uses of the word fairy as well - such as a type of hummingbird, a leading brand of washing up liquid and its also used in Pokeman PlotterFairy (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Who coined this ?!?

From a psychological point of view naming a homosexual man a fairy is critical ! Fairies are manifestations of the Anima archetype in a male psyche, cf. - Dr. Joan Relke: The Archetypal Female in Mythology and Religion: The Anima and the Mother. Very likely this term was coined by heterosexual men to devaluate homosexual men, however the heterosexuals who did this are in a critical psychic state because they have an extremely negative relationship towards their Anima. Very likely the heterosexuals who coined this term are under the influence by a patriarchic culture, very likely they are monotheists, either christians or muslims. In the monotheistic religions the relation of Animus and Anima is out of balance ( deities represent only Animus, i.e. father, son, holy ghost, females like i.e. Mary only receive and obey commands, in the monotheistic religions are no souvereign female deities ). The monotheistic religions force the Anima to be suppressed, what leads to exactly the symptoms that can be observed here: devaluation of anything that is related to Anima, i.e. burning of witches (Femicide), ...

In a normal male psyche a fairy or the Anima should be valued as something positive, here a fairy, as a symbol for the Anima, is used to express hate

This critical psychological state becomes also obvious in the huge list of derogatory terms for homosexuals in the US culture : List_of_LGBT_slang_terms (for my personal feeling this is all hate speech)

My native language is German we have 2 or 3 words for homosexuals How to say gay in German

I know the common reflex to link Germans to fascism in the US culture but you should know one thing: Adolf Hitler had a secret : He was a Christian like you ! Likewise as his clerical-fascist dictator friends in Slovakia (Josef Tizo), in Spain (Francisco Franco), in Croatia (Ustase, Miroslav Filipović), in Romania (Iron Guard - Legion of Archangel Michael), in Vichy-France, ...

And Hjalmar Schacht was a freemason, like many of your presidents, Allen Dulles regularily met with the fascist leadership in Basel in the Bank for International Settlements. The christians considered fascism as a bulwark against atheist bolshevism, this is the reason why the CIA recruited so many high ranking Nazis after WWII, i.e. Reinhard Gehlen, a Knight of Malta, and so again a christian like you.

But this is only additional information, however information that is not completely unlinked, because in the christian worldview the balance between Animus and Anima is also broken.

In addition the exaggerated interest in the sexuality of others is an item in the F-Scale (F-scale (personality_test)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2450:102C:38A:31DA:3472:670F:1DE9 (talk) 04:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

A misplaced illustration with a misleading caption
"Classic representation of a small fairy with butterfly wings commonly used in modern times. Luis Ricardo Falero, 1888."

It is placed randomly at an end of one section (Characteristics), illustrating literally nothing.

"Classic" should be changed to "modern", and the picture moved to illustrate the Depictions section where the modern concept of fairies with wings is talked about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.104.162 (talk) 09:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Repeating my request after 3 weeks with no response. Or just to unblock the article for edits, and I'll probably fix other things too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.114.12 (talk) 16:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yellow check.svg Partly done: moved image to more relevant section, but rewrote caption as sentence fragment that avoids repetition of "modern". Next time, from the article, click the "View source" tab, then the blue "Submit an edit request" button on the right, and follow the instructions there. That method automatically attaches a template that hails someone to review the request. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Fairies in Discworld
Should a reference be added to the Discworld portrayal of faries, in the 'In literature ' section? &#60;span style&#61;&#34;font-family: Blackadder ITC&#59; background-color: lightgreen&#59; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px&#59;&#34;&#62;&#91;&#91;User:Qwerfjkl&#124;&#60;span style&#61;&#34;color: brown&#34;&#62;Qwerfjkl&#60;/span&#62;&#93;&#93; &#91;&#91;User talk:Qwerfjkl&#124;&#60;span style&#61;&#34;color: purple&#34;&#62;talk&#60;/span&#62;&#93;&#93;&#60;/span&#62; (talk) 20:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Probable misspelling in Etymology
Besides the lack of reference for the first paragraph, some other online sources like the Wikitionary and the Online Etymology Dictionary, suggests that the spelling is Faerie or Færie, not Faierie. Neither Faie, but Fae. Even the source of the second paragraph, that credits that "In Old French romance, a faie or fee[...]", does not mention Faierie neither Faie with those spellings, but do mention a Faerie Queene and an  Abode of the Faes. Fee, however is in tune to the sources.

The possible misspelling appears five times in three different sentences:
 * 1) "Faerie, in turn, derives from the Old French form faierie, a derivation from faie (from Vulgar Latin fata) with the abstract noun suffix -erie." -- in the first paragraph.
 * 2) "In Old French romance, a faie or fee was a woman skilled in magic, and who knew the power and virtue of words, of stones, and of herbs." -- in the second paragraph.
 * 3) "Faie became Modern English fay, while faierie became fairy, but this spelling almost exclusively refers to one individual (the same meaning as fay). In the sense of "land where fairies dwell", archaic spellings faery and faerie are still in use." -- in the third paragraph.

I suggest to adapt the first sentence to be in a more fine tune with the sources (removing, for example "with the abstract noun suffix -erie.") and then add the mentioned sources, or others. Even Tolkien when mentioning faierie with an i mentions it explaining a mistake made by an Oxford Dictionary edition prior to A.D. 1450PDF page 4.

--Carretinha (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Feary (surname) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Work of H.P. Lovecraft about Fairy as "Hidden people"
Could just someone edit the rubric "Hidden people" of this page "Fairy" for mention the work of Lovecraft about this ?

In 1932, the famous writer H.P. Lovecraft writes a short text about this thesis :"Some backgrounds of Fairyland" Reference : H.P. Lovecraft. « Some backgrounds of Fairyland » in Marginalia, Arkham House, 1944, p. 174-181. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:A36:1630:A88D:1D8:F5B:5BE7 (talk) 14:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

The "Demoted Pagan Deities" section, lacks citations
This is my first time suggesting/editing wikipedia, so please go easy on me, also please excuse formatting

"Demoted pagan deities

At one time it was thought that fairies were originally worshiped as deities, such as nymphs and tree spirits,[28] and with the burgeoning predominance of the Christian Church, reverence for these deities carried on, but in a dwindling state of perceived power. Many deprecated deities of older folklore and myth were repurposed as fairies in Victorian fiction (See the works of W. B. Yeats for examples)."

The "Demoted Pagan Deities" section only has a single example/citation. There really should be more than a source citation if possible.

SARankDirector (talk) 15:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)