Talk:Falafel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose):I find the prose is clear and concise (even engaging), and the spelling and grammar are correct.
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): Lead comply with lead and perfectly meets this request: "establish significance, include mention of notable criticism or controversies, and be written in a way that makes readers want to know more". It is not too long and authors found very good balance between "the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material". The text of the article complies with requests of layout, although maybe it would be a good idea to have "See also" section with links including (i.e.) Middle Eastern cuisine and Vegetarian cuisine. In that case links to other wikiprojects (wikibooks and commons) could be placed in see also section which is more appropriate place for them than references section. Also, I hope that Nutrition template will have a better place in future, after the increase of the text of the article or template is improved and made collapsible. There are no words to watch in it.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * a. (references):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects): I think that Falafel is also very popular in Europe, not only in Middle East or USA but that is a possibility for the future improvement.
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Congratulations, not an easy job in this article.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.: I think that all past disputes are properly resolved following NPOV policy
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass.
 * Pass/Fail: Pass.