Talk:Falls of Clyde (waterfalls)

Requested move 30 April 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No move. Consensus is that the actual falls are not the primary topic. Cúchullain t/ c 16:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Falls of Clyde (waterfalls) → Falls of Clyde – I suggest this is the primary meaning, it is a well-known landmark, and the original meaning. The ship should be a hatnote. PatGallacher (talk) 11:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose, Per the |Falls_of_Clyde_(waterfalls) page view statistics of the two articles it seems that there is no primary topic here. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  07:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Per page view statistics as above. Apparently Falls of Clyde (ship) is rather a big deal, historic, and has a bigger article. And more page views, although they're in the same ballpark. Keep it like it is with the disambiguation page. Herostratus (talk) 08:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.