Talk:False God (song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 12:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 13:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 13:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Infobox looks good!
 * Remove close wikilink on riff per MOS:LINKSTYLE
 * Pipe music critics to Music journalism
 * "otherwise found it" → "otherwise found the song"
 * "Commercially "False God" peaked at number 56" → "Commercially, the song peaked at number 59"
 * List the full name of the ARIA Singles Chart
 * Mention that the certification was in Australia
 * "by its musical director" → "by the show's musical director" and mention the years of this performance and her tour
 * Mention Ryan Hurd's cover version
 * I also included James Bay if that's okay. Gained (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Background and release

 * The "love letter to love itself" quote is not mentioned by the source
 * "celebrity at the time" is not needed in the sentence since we know the media would be focused on her status and at the time is implied
 * Wouldn't the chart positions go better in a new para of reception, retitling to simply this word?
 * Personally, I think they fit better with "Background and release" and I believe it's too short to a new paragraph for it on "Critical reception". I also think that section is very tightly focused so adding info about chart performance would kinda make it a bit unfocused and forced. Gained (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The correct Australia position is number 59, not 56

Production and music

 * Audio sample looks good!
 * "in New York City, and" → "in New York City (NYC), and" per later instances appearing in the article
 * Pipe Michael Riddleberger to Bleachers (band)
 * "Sterling Sound in New York City." → "Sterling Sound in NYC."
 * Either remove the pipe on Evan Smith or send to Bleachers (band), not sure since they are already linked
 * "considered it "faux-R&B"." → "considered the song "faux-R&B"."
 * Re-invoke the Lipshutz ref for the slow jam sentence
 * Maybe only use the dash as 1980s R&B-influenced?
 * lovers' rock → lovers rock with the wikilink

Lyrical content and analysis

 * First para looks good!
 * "using heaven imagery:" → "using heavenly imagery:"
 * "The couple encounters problems" → "The couple encounters challenges"
 * "to make amends but" → "to make amends, but"
 * "Religious imagery continue" → "Religious imagery continues"
 * "my hips"[31] and ultimately accepts" → "my hips",[31] ultimately accepting"
 * "the mentions of New York City and" → "the mentions of NYC and"
 * Maybe it would be suitable to mention "Cruel Summer" is from this album and the other two tracks are from 1989?

Critical reception

 * "called it a" → "called the song a"
 * Refinery29 should not be italicised
 * "to be confident that evoked" → "to have confidence that evoked" or something similar to be clear
 * "Lipshutz ranked it third among" → "Lipshutz ranked the song third among"
 * "Some critics regarded" → "A few critics regarded"
 * "and the New-York references ineffective but" → "and the NYC references ineffective, but"
 * "somewhat experimental production but" → "somewhat experimental production, but"

Live performances and covers

 * Img looks good!
 * The flat shoes are not sourced
 * "and "vibey" and highlighting" → "and "vibey", and highlighting"
 * "of the 45th Saturday Night Live season;" → "of the 45th SNL season;"
 * The one on guitar and one on piano throughout the tour is not sourced as far as I can see
 * "on the 53 U.S. dates,"
 * Sorry what? Gained (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * "The next year, she performed" → "In 2024, she performed"
 * Mention that James Bay sang the chorus as falsetto
 * "on his 2020 Platonic Tour: he replaced the" → "on his 2020 Platonic Tour, replacing the"

Personnel

 * Looks good!

Charts

 * Looks good!

Certifications

 * Looks good!

Final comments and verdict

 * until all of the issues are fixed; completed right on time! --K. Peake 15:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey @Kyle Peake! I have addressed all your points except those that I have comments above. Gained (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you and regarding the Refinery29 citations, change work to publisher and the 53 U.S. dates was added by accident from me. --K. Peake 17:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Kyle Peake I believe everything's now addressed! Gained (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ now, this is very good sorry I was busy yesterday outside of online usage! --K. Peake 08:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey @Kyle Peake! Thank you very much for the review but I think you forgot to pass the article? Gained (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)