Talk:False potto/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –  VisionHolder « talk » 20:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm claiming this review. Comments coming shortly. –  VisionHolder « talk » 20:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments: Excellent article, and very clear to read for a taxon article with a lot of discussion of anatomy.
 * Thanks. Ucucha 21:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Other than that, it looks good to me. –  VisionHolder « talk » 20:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "excavation in the skull" – any alternative wording? Not a traditional statement for the people who aren't anatomists.
 * "Excavation" is probably not the right word. I changed it to use "depression" instead.
 * Nowak 1999 and Leutwyler 1996 are listed in short footnotes, but not in the "Literature cited".
 * Nowak added; ref = harv added for Leutwyyler.
 * The link to "Oates et al. 2008" doesn't work, and probably won't unless we start adding that feature to the various IUCN Red List ref templates. Personally, I just put news and web refs in the References section, then use notes for journals and books.  It's up to you how you want to do it, though.
 * Added an anchor to fix this.
 * Unfortunately, the anchor doesn't highlight the ref, but this will have to do. –  VisionHolder « talk » 02:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I've never used Sfnm before, but for some reason the first short footnote in ref #17 doesn't work.
 * It's because I misspelled Schwartz's name as Schwarz. Fixed (also on a few other occasions).
 * Funny... I could swear I checked the spelling. –  VisionHolder « talk » 02:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "citing C. Wild" – Do we have any information about who this is or what publication it's referring to?
 * It's a personal communication; clarified.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Great job! Thanks for writing this primate article. –  VisionHolder « talk » 02:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)