Talk:Falun Gong/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Phillipedison1891 (talk · contribs) 03:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose is above average. Layout complies with MOS. No spelling/grammar errors that I could see.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Cites a wide variety of sources. There is some redundancy and inconsistent formatting in the citations, though.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article is fairly comprehensive. Ideally, it could be a little leaner, but there is no obviously unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Although the article goes into detail regarding the persecution of Falun Gong, this is no propaganda piece. Cites some skeptical sources regarding the more sensational claims.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Some minor controversy in the edit history, but it was almost a month ago, and was handled respectfully and sanely by all parties concerned.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Indeed a Good Article, although substantial improvement is required to bring it to FA status.
 * Indeed a Good Article, although substantial improvement is required to bring it to FA status.