Talk:Fame Academy series 2

Fair use rationale for Image:FA Finalists.jpg
Image:FA Finalists.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Problems.
This whole section needs more references. Especially the second paragraph. Where are the references to this controversy and inappropriate behaviour on the part of one of the guests?. This is a factual encylopedia, as it stands, this sounds like original research. What do others think? 86.168.226.229 (talk) 05:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Agreed..there are no sources, and I don't seem to remember any controversy in the media(re the win). There was negative coverage, but that was for the series as a whole.I have searched for controversy fame academy 2 and the only page that mentions anything about controversy is this page..I'll wait a few days and if noone objects I'll remove the section86.179.64.52 (talk) 16:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 one external links on Fame Academy (series 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060623021911/http://www.fameacademywatch.co.uk:80/ArtCategory00001.aspx to http://www.fameacademywatch.co.uk/ArtCategory00001.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060513204626/http://www.fameacademywatch.co.uk:80/Article00023.aspx to http://www.fameacademywatch.co.uk/Article00023.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060620042340/http://offthetelly.co.uk:80/reviews/2003/fameacademy.htm to http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/reviews/2003/fameacademy.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061117123342/http://www.ipa.co.uk:80/documents/bbcroyalcharter.pdf to http://www.ipa.co.uk/documents/bbcroyalcharter.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Fame Academy (series 2). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929083514/http://www.forum.thefasc.com/ to http://www.forum.thefasc.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)