Talk:Fanari, Preveza

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Fanari, Preveza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150921212047/http://dlib.statistics.gr:80/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00098%20.pdf to http://dlib.statistics.gr/Book/GRESYE_02_0101_00098%20.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Addition of alternative name
According to those arguments presented in the specific edit-summaries: [][] the inclusion of an alternative name in lead needs 10%+ of the local population to belong to the relevant ethnic group & this should be based on a recent source. Well, I fail to see this in the case of the current municipality of Fanari (also note that the traditional region of Fanari does not coincide with the municipality since several villages are today part of Thesprotia prefecture.).Alexikoua (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The source does not say the Albanian speakers are under 10% of the population, therefore there is no objective argument for removal. If a source deems it notable enough to include information about an Albanian community here, and we lack other data that suggests a smaller component of said community, that means we should include the Albanian name there too. Alltan (talk) 21:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: The Albanian name has been included for almost a year, it has a citation and its inclusion falls under WP:NCGN which allows the use of multiple local names. It is unacceptable to change the status quo which is the result of consensus building with such actions. There will not be a revival of old disputes and revert-warring in debates which ended with a consensus accepted and followed by all sides without any deviation.--Maleschreiber (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Consensus changes overtime and there is no valid argument for this part to stay, per wp:NCGN. The source presented concerns the traditional version of Fanari (Tsoutsoumpis), which includes villages that are part of another municipality now.Alexikoua (talk) 21:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That argument is invalid because the municipality's name is based on the region's name. Or better said, it's the same name. Alltan (talk) 21:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)