Talk:Fantastic Light/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

I'll review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Infobox


 * Cite $8,486,957 earnings.


 * Intro


 * Can you mention when the horse had his debut and when he retired, his last race?


 * Racing career


 * Please wikilink the other horses, missing or not and all through the article
 * Royal Ascot 1999, date please.
 * 2000 Coronation Cup at Epsom, date please.

Improvements made

 * Cite $8,486,957 earnings.done
 * debut and when he retired done
 * wikilink the other horses done
 * Royal Ascot and Coronation Cup dated done

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

That's fine. I still though think the prose is a little weak in places which would need to be much improved with further research and content if it is to ever reach FA.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)