Talk:Fantasy Magazine (2005)

Awards & Mentions section and general structure
The length of the Awards & Mentions section is a bit over the top. In general, I suggest using the articles for comparable, more established magazines such as F&SF as a model. Other the article is at risk of a Promotional tag and harsh edits by people who know nothing about the magazine. --Pleasantville (talk) 12:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC) aka Kathryn Cramer
 * Even now it reeks of padding the resume to encompass every good story it's ever published. Instead, how about some actual, y'know, reliable third-party sources? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi - Apologies if I post this note to the wrong section. I'm not Wikipedia-savvy. The Fantasy Magazine page needs updating. There've been changes at Fantasy Magazine. New editor, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.221.206.186 (talk) 07:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)