Talk:Fascist Italianization

Untitled
Italianization was a natural process in Istria over the time because the diferences betwin slavic, usualy workers, and italians, usualy masters, work like a pressure factor.In this case every slvic who become rich people in fact become italian. By the other way italians were the symbol of culture (e.g. Renaissance)and normaly slavic people try be integreted into a herittage of roman emperium.Over the century the italianization was a peacefuly process that means was accepted and wanted by slavic.

In relation with the germanic it is better to observe what is happend in last 100 years with romansh in Gritschum and with italians in Ticino (Swisse).The germans press in south by 1000 years, Swiss colonization in detriment of the romanic(french,italin and romansch)it is the main proof.Italianization against the germanic?It is not true.

About the relationship betwin french people and italians we have to see the situation of Nisa.At the begining of the xix century was a italian city and now italian language was vanishid from area.Italianization in relation with french?Where?

IN THIS CASE I ASK FOR URGENTLY MODIFICATION OF THIS PAGE BECAUSE IT S CONTENT IS MALICIOS AND ANTI-ITALIN. BY THE WAY I AM NOT ITALIAN. --proturism 04:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

The slavic are not natives in Dalmatia == --proturism 03:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Neither the Italians if we think that a population who lives in a region for 1300 years can't be considered autochtonous. GhePeU 11:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Not alone.With istroromanian the real natives of this area (by the way a lot of them forced to become slavic), with ragusan and morlach(black wallach)(vanished by slavic), and with italian.Of corse the istroromanian, ragusan, morlach and italian are the people who are the real autochtonus inhabitants of Dalmatia and Illiricum like have their ancestors the roman. Of all the Romance languages, it could be said that Romanian(and istroromanian like a dialect of romanian) is the most archaic one, having retained, for example, the inflected structure of Latin grammar.That prove the slavic are not the real native of this area.--proturism 01:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * This is true, but I don't think that we can adopt this approach, I prefer to assume that someone who lives in a region for more than two centuries can be considered native. If the Dalmatian and Istrian slavs are not autochtonous of a place where they live since VII century, what are they? GhePeU 09:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Terms natives and autochthonous means people who formed or originating in the place were found.(Merriam Webster s Dictionary)--proturism 09:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * We can discuss this but, please, edit without removing all the wiki tags. I can agree on the removal of autochtonous, but by removing that term there is no need to specify when Slavs, Germans or French arrived in the area, nor when Italian arrived: the articles on Germans, Italians and Slavs are linked. Also, this article is about the italianization policy; we all know that the adoption of ethnic policies isn't an Italian peculiarity, but the repression of Italians is off topic here: there are specific articles, like Foiba and you could write an article on Alpenvorland. GhePeU 12:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Explain this behaviour
Giovanni Giove, what is this ? What kind of behaviour is that? Are you on a some kind of crusade on denying of Croatian toponyms and belonging of Eastern Adriatic to Croatia (you especially have a pick on Croatia and Croats), and removing any connection of those areas with Croatia and Croats? Kubura 05:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Giovanni Giove, are you trying to show us example of violent italization of Croats and Slovenians? Kubura 08:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Ghepeu, what is this ? Why have you removed the following areas affected by the violent italianization of Slovenians: Gorizia, Triest and Carso areas, and areas affected by the violent italianization of Croats: Croatian Littoral - Istria, Kvarner, Rijeka, Gorski Kotar (though, there're also affected small Croat communities in Carso and Triest areas)? Why are you hiding that? These areas were especially affected by violent italianization. Kubura 08:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not hiding anything. If you check the article history, you can see that I'm removing only the headers, who I find unnecessary because most of them divide the article in sections with a single sentence (and because of bad wording). The exceptions are one clearly non neutral sentence ("Italianisation attempts are still to be found today", "use of Internet for spreading Italian irredentist and revisionist propaganda") and another sentence which has clearly some problems, because it backs a pretended quote ("funny Slavic names") with a Regio Decreto regarding Trento, where there weren't Slavic names at all.GhePeU 08:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

True, Slavs (Croats and Slovenians) are very rare there (in Trento). But, there were the cases of Slovenian and Croat families that somehow got there during centuries - mostly because of economic (and political) reasons, or because they've got the job there, like it was the case in Habsburg Monarchy/Austria-Hungary. I've found that law on Internet, and there was a Slav person that posted it. In Italian domain. Don't worry, I'll provide you the other laws, that had as purpose italianization of non-wanted surnames. Wait till beside Croats, and Slovenians, Austrians/Germans, Greeks and Albanians begin to contribute here. They have to say something about that too. Kubura 09:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

One of best examples of Croat families "that somehow got in" Trento, Friuli, Gorizia etc. is Tony Croatto, Italian singer of Croat origin. Kubura (talk) 14:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Italianization attempts today
About non-neutrality of sentences "Italianisation attempts are still to be found today", "use of Internet for spreading Italian irredentist and revisionist propaganda". If you think that we're fools over here, on the other side of Adriatic, than you're wrong. Kubura 09:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Italian Constitution Art. 6: "La Repubblica tutela con apposite norme le minoranze linguistiche." (The Republic safeguards by means of appropriate measures linguistic minorities.) And about the "irredentist and revisionist propaganda" I think that after the Yugoslav Wars, you can hardly present Croats, Slovenians, Serbians and Albanians as the most shining examples of toleration. GhePeU 10:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The Republic     safeguards by means of appropriate measures linguistic minorities.)

Congratulations! you have given us an excellent example. Italy does not confess the presence of any national minorities but exclusively linguistical. So, according to you there no any national minorities. ALL Italians.Nice way to show respect to minorities. Let's do not forget facts that Slovenian minority can not have their names written using the characters Č Ž Š0 in the official documents. Legally, they are not Slovenes but Slovene speaking Italians. bravo! Nice for the country which has invented fascism. Ave! --Anto 21:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC) What did Italian high-positioned political told few months ago, Ghepeu? Who messes with Croatian territory? Do you remember what he said? Who gave racist anti-Slavic remarks like "Slavic hateridge and vengeance" in 1945? Which country had fascist party on the rule in 1990? I misini, MSI, "Movimento Sociale Italiano" ("post-fascist", as described by its leader) If you play dumb, Ghepeu, no problem, I'll present the others all the revisionist and open and perfidious expansionism/imperialism that came from Italian political scene. As I say, wait till the Greeks and Albanians and Austrians/Germans join here. Oh, yes, last but not the least, the Frenchmen. Kubura 22:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

You've removed a  reference and a part of referenced text  here, Ghepeu. You can't do such things. Especially deleting the lines that are referenced. That, what you've done, is a vandalism. Now, if I don't want to behave like a vandal, and simply copy my last version and paste it here as new, possibly overwriting someone's good quality contributions, I have to read thoroughlly what you have done in your version. And now I see that you've removed that line, by simple merging of text, hiding the removed text that way. You've been warned for the  FIRST time .Kubura 08:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

--Raguseo 02:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)== Restored the redirect ==

Giove, restore the article as it was. You make such changes to article, without asking other contributors for the opinion. Violent Italianization of non-Italians happened also before fascist regime. Even old Austria-Hungary tolerated such behaviour on its territory (e.g., Austria was stalking with the rights of Croat majority). Kubura 18:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This article is about the Fascist Italianization.--Giovanni Giove 20:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

You're dismembering the page. Second, I see that again the impacted areas are removed from the article : Slovenians in Gorizia, Triest and Carso areas, Croat populations notably one from Croatian Littoral - Istria, Kvarner, Rijeka, Gorski Kotar.... I also see removed the reference to one of fascist laws, that regulated the forced Italianization. Laws, in which "funny Slavic names" were forbidden and was ordered to "restore them in original Italian form". (e.g. "Regio decreto legge 10 Gennaio 1926, n. 17: Restituzione in forma italiana dei cognomi delle famiglie della provincia di Trento"). That's not the way the things work here, Giove. Kubura 08:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Read well and stop wiht usual useless accusations. Your reference is still inserted, the areas the same (with the correct name). The page was not disembered, but splitted in two indipendent article, because the "Fascist Italiaization" had the 90% of the space of "Italnization".--Giovanni Giove 08:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Merger
I have proposed a merger of this page back with the Italianization. There is no reason to breake article's subsections into different articles. Clearly this is against Wikipedia's policy. --Raguseo 02:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Forced Italianization of Dalmatia and Istria occured in several periods: during Venetian occupation of Dalmatia (1409-1798) - Venetianization, during Italian administration in the area in 19th century and finally during Italian fascistic years in 20th century. This last Fascist Italianization was ideologically based on previous attempts and was meant to be finalization of it. Articles should be merged. Zenanarh 14:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

The Italianizaton and Italian cultural expansionism/imperialism can be seen even today (one of best examples are revisionist and expansionist claims told by highest officials of Italy). Regarding Italianization before fascism, that's known thing. E.g., the persecution of Croat friars during Republic of Venice; then, the terrorist methods (perpetrated by pro-Italianists and tolerated by Austria) against pro-Croat voters in Austrian part of the monarchy. So, I agree with merging this article back to the article Italianization. Kubura 14:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The article is correct as it is, it was recntly splitted. Italianization is a linguistic, historic, cultural phenomena. The fascist italanization is just a small aspect of this (and the worst, BTW). Other claims by R and Z. are disputable POVs. The same article is present even in the Italian, Norvegian and German wikipedia. --Giovanni Giove 23:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Fascist Italianization is part of the same phenomenon of Italianization. There is absolutly no reason to divide it like this. --Raguseo 22:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That was it was done in 4 different Wikipedias.--Giovanni Giove 23:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't care about Italian, Norwegian and German Wikipedia, my concern is English Wikipedia. --Raguseo 00:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Italianization in Dalmatia during Venetian ruling was not a linguistic, historic, cultural phenomena! It was political, economical and cultural terror of the huge majority of population. It can be presented by: persecutions of native Croatian/Dalmatian noblemen, anti-Slavic regulations by Venetian government, forced changing of original toponims, forbidden usage of native language (i.e. it was impossible to publish Croatian literacy in Zadar in 16th century, it was much easier to publish it in Venice! - for Venetians it was important that it's not published in the place of originating!!!), destroying of economical prosperity of the region and the natives, etc...

Italianization in 19th century: Italian language made official in Austrian province Dalmatia by faked documents - an act done by Italian immigrants-administrators removed from lost Italian provinces to Dalmatia by Austrian government, forced Italianization of personal names and toponims in Istria and Dalmatia, forbidden usage of any other language except Italian in public schools and gymnasuims until 1860 when Italians and pro-Italians lost their influence in the Senate, conducting of censi results in Istria and Dalmatia, etc...

All this cannot be described as Fascist Italianization!Zenanarh 14:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

... despite all I still believe that this is not the "average" Croatian culture:-). Honestly, Zenanarh, people like you an Kubura, ad the other member of the merry brigade, are a shame for your own country. It is notable that you are acting more and more like a meatball.Giovanni Giove 15:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
The edit below is total vandalism.  You, User:Ghepeu, have no right to delete entire paragraph just because you do not like to have your dirty laundry here displayed. It is well known what Napolitano said and when.Documented very well!

We can talk abou the POV, but you may not delete it! --Anto 13:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Bullshits. The "Napolitano quotes" are fabricated, the amnesty by Togliatti was about the Italian fascist in the public administration, not about the military. The Italian constitution explicitly protects the ethnic and linguistics minorities, the Italian state finance German- and Slovene-language schools, and every year, for example, contributes 3 million euros to the Slovenian newspaper published in Trieste. GhePeU 19:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

OK I will request an arbitration for this! If you insist to claim that chicken are in fact eagles. --Anto 20:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Ghepeu says "blatant propaganda" for the reference from Italian domain: "un moto di odio e di furia sanguinaria, e un disegno annessionistico slavo, che prevalse innanzitutto nel Trattato di pace del 1947" ? Kubura 07:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Ghepeu, also, watch your language ("bullshit"). You derrogate the discussion. If you find this as "fabrication", then have in mind that that "fabrication" (Napolitano's statement) caused official reaction by Croatia president Stipe Mesić. Here's Mesić's reaction in statement from 12 Feb 2007 (2 days after Napolitano's one) and statement from 17 Feb 2007 (after the talks in Farnesina from 13 Feb 2007, in which Ita. Minister of Foreign Affairs, M. D'Alema explained Napolitano's words to Cro. Embassador T. Vidošević). Here's Mesić's comment in a magazine, an week later. Kubura 08:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

What has Napolitano said ???
Here is a video from Italian tv station

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw9FRBBiKkw

For those who do not undestand Italian here are some websites for translation:

English-Italian Dictionary by WordReference

English-Italian Dictionary by ECTACO

English-Italian Dictionary by Fredict.com

English-Italian Dictionary by Ultralingua

Babel Fish Translation

From Italian Press

http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Politica/2007/02_Febbraio/10/napolitano.shtml
 * Corriere della Sera

''Il dramma del popolo giuliano-dalmata fu scatenato «da un moto di odio e furia sanguinaria e un disegno annessionistico slavo che prevalse innanzitutto nel trattato di pace del 1947, e che assunse i sinistri contorni di una pulizia etnica». Lo ha detto il presidente della Repubblica, Giorgio Napolitano, intervenendo nel Giorno del ricordo delle vittime delle foibe, le cavità carsiche nelle quali, tra il 1943 e il 1945, vennero fatti sparire migliaia di oppositori al regime di Tito. «Non dobbiamo tacere - ha aggiunto il presidente, che al Quirinale ha incontrato gli eredi delle vittime -, assumendoci la responsabilità di aver negato o teso ad ignorare la verità per pregiudiziali ideologiche e cecità politica» il dramma del popolo giuliano-dalmata. Una tragedia, ha spiegato, «rimossa per calcoli dilomatici e convenienze internazionali».''

Translation into English:

''The drama of the people Giuliano-Dalmatian was triggered "from a motion of hatred and bloody-thirsty fury and a Slavic annexionistic design that prevailed in the first place in the peace treaty of 1947, and that assumed the left contours of one ethnic purity". It has said the president of the Republic, George Napolitano, taking part in the Day of the memory of the victims of the foibe, the carsiche cavities in which, between 1943 and 1945, they came made to disappear migliaia of oppositori to the regimen of Tito. "we do not have tacere - it has added the president, that to the Quirinale it has met the eredi of the victims -, assuming ideological prejudicial the responsibility to have denied to us or stiff to ignore the truth for and political blindness" the drama of the people giuliano-Dalmatian. A tragedy, has explained, "removed for calculations diplomatic to us and international conveniences".''

http://www.unita.it/view.asp?IDcontent=63493
 * L'Unita

''Napolitano ha quindi voluto richiamarsi esplicitamente al suo predecessore, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, dicendo che ne raccoglie l'esempio circa «il dovere che le istituzioni della Repubblica sentono come proprio, a tutti i livelli, di un riconoscimento troppo a lungo mancato» delle tragedie di un intero popolo di istriani, fiumani e dalmati, che al confine orientale dell' Italia, dopo l'8 settembre '43, furono vittime di un «moto di odio e di furia sanguinaria e di un disegno annessionistico slavo che prevalse innanzitutto nel Trattato di pace del 1947 e che assunse i sinistri contorni di una pulizia etnica». Una tragedia la cui memoria «ha rischiato di essere cancellata» e che invece, ha aggiunto il capo dello Stato, deve essere trasmessa ai giovani nello spirito della legge del 2004 che ha istituito il Giorno del Ricordo.

Nell' autunno 1943, ha aggiunto Napolitano citando recenti riflessioni e ricerche, «si intrecciarono giustizialismo sommario e tumultuoso, parossismo nazionalista, rivalse sociali e un disegno di sradicamento della presenza italiana da quella che era e cessò di essere la Venezia Giulia». «La disumana ferocia delle foibe fu una delle barbarie del secolo scorso, in cui si intrecciarono in Europa cultura e barbarie. Non bisogna mai smarrire consapevolezza di ciò - ha sottolineato - nel valorizzare i tratti più nobili della nostra tradizione storica e nel consolidare i lineamenti di civiltà, di pace, di libertà, di tolleranza, di solidarietà della nuova Europa che stiamo costruendo da oltre 50 anni, e che è nata dal rifiuto dei nazionalismi aggressivi e oppressivi, da quello espresso nella guerra fascista a quello espresso nell' ondata di terrore jugoslavo in Venezia Giulia. La nuova Europa esclude naturalmente anche ogni revanscismo».''

Translation into English:

''Napolitano has therefore intentional to explicitly recall to its predecessor, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, saying that of it collects the example approximately "the duty that the institutions of the Republic feel like just, to all the levels, of an acknowledgment too much to along lacked" the tragedies of entire people of istriani, fiumani and Dalmatian, than to the border orient them of Italy, after the 8 september ' 43, were victims of a "motion of hatred and bloody-thirsty fury and of a Slavic annexionistic design that prevailed in the first place in the Peace treaty of 1947 and that assumed the left contours of an ethnic purity ". A tragedy whose memory "has risked to being cancelled" and that instead, has added the head of the State, must be transmitted to the young people in the spirit of the law of 2004 that has instituted the Day of the Memory. In autumn 1943, it has added to Napolitano citing recent reflections and searches, "interlaced highly summarized and tumultuous giustizialismo, paroxysm nationalist, availed again social and a design of uprooting of the Italian presence from that it was and it stopped of being the Venice Julia". "the disumana ferocity of the foibe was one of the barbarisms of the slid century, in which culture and barbarisms were interlaced in Europe. It never does not have smarrire knowledge of that - it has emphasized - in valuing the nobler features of our historical tradition and in consolidating the lineamenti of civilization, peace, freedom, tolerance, solidarity of the Europe new that we are constructing give beyond 50 years, and that it is been born from the refusal of the aggressive and oppressive nationalisms, from that expressing in the fascist war to that expressing in the big wave of Yugolav terror in Venice Julia. The Europe new excludes also every revanscism naturally ".''

http://www.repubblica.it/2007/02/sezioni/cronaca/foibe-memoria/foibe-memoria/foibe-memoria.html Napolitano ha voluto richiamarsi esplicitamente al suo predecessore, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, dicendo che ne raccoglie l'esempio circa "il dovere che le istituzioni della Repubblica sentono come proprio, a tutti i livelli, di un riconoscimento troppo a lungo mancato" delle tragedie di un intero popolo di istriani, fiumani e dalmati, che al confine orientale dell' Italia, dopo l'8 settembre '43, furono vittime di un moto di odio e di furia sanguinaria che assunse i sinistri contorni di una pulizia etnica". Una tragedia la cui memoria "ha rischiato di essere cancellata" e che invece, ha aggiunto il capo dello Stato, deve essere trasmessa ai giovani nello spirito della legge del 2004 che ha istituito il Giorno del Ricordo.
 * La Repubblica

Translation into English:

Napolitano has intentional to explicitly recall to its predecessore, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, saying that of it collects the example approximately "the duty that the institutions of the Republic feel like just, to all the levels, of an acknowledgment too much to along lacked" the tragedies of entire people of istriani, fiumani and Dalmatian, than to the border orient them of Italy, after the 8 september ' 43, were victims of a motion of hatred and bloody-thirsty fury that assumed the left contours of an ethnic purity ". A tragedy whose memory "has risked to being cancelled" and that instead, has added the head of the State, must be transmitted to the young people in the spirit of the law of 2004 that has instituted the Day of the Memory.

--Anto 09:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

From International Press http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/europe/6360429.stm
 * BBC News

Wave of hatred'Last weekend, at only the third remembrance day held for Foibe victims, President Napolitano said the massacre had been motivated by "a wave of bloodthirsty hatred and fury as well as a Slavic annexation plan".''


 * Taipei Times

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2007/02/15/2003349123

'' It began with Italian President Giorgio Napolitano's speech on Saturday to mark the deaths of thousands of Italians who were pulled from their homes, tortured and shot by Communist Yugoslav partisans during and at the end of the war.

Some victims were thrown -- sometimes still alive -- into alpine crevasses known in local dialect as foibe, and the atrocities became known as the foibe killings.

"There was a wave of hate and bloody fury, and a Slavic expansionist design ... that took on the sinister appearance of an ethnic cleansing," Napolitano said.''

So much about that. This displays the essence of the statement by Giorgio Napolitano:Slavic people are just barbarians who wanted to distroy great italian Culture

--Anto 09:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but who cares? The present article is about "Fascist Italianization": it has nothing to do with Napolitano's speech, that is connected with the Istrian exodus.Giovanni Giove 10:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Many users here have voted to merge this article back to the article Italianization. Second, this speech of Napolitano has a lot of things, even with fascism. If I remember well, president Mesić has (in his official reaction) mentioned that Napolitano has forgotten what Italy has done on the territory of Croatia and Slovenia before capitulation in 1943. If you think that Italy has only been feeding sparrows on this side of Adriatic in the period 1918-1943, then you're wrong. Fascist squads and collaborators were terrorizing and killing the locals Slavs, Croats and Slovenians (victims were ordinary civilians, communists and even Catholic priests), and when the "big protector", fascist protegées got a good reason to have fear from revenge of locals. Kubura (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Protected
I have protected this page for a week because of ongoing edit-warring. Protection isn't an endorsement of the current version; please discuss the article here rather than continuing to edit war. If you are agreed in advance of the week expiring as to where to take the article, please list at WP:RPP; if you need an urgent edit place editprotected here with details of the edit and an administrator will come and deal with it. Stifle (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Fascist is not Irredentist
I quoted the Napolitano statement because I wanted to sow an example of obviuos xenophobia by very important person in today Italy. I did not quote some hooligan from the street, neither some declared far-right leader(such as Roberto Menia or Gianfranco Fini).

Napolitano is leftist, a communist.

Massimo D'Alema is also leftist. Recently he requested the change Treaty of Osimo. He describe the threaty as injustice. --Anto 18:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I haven't seen your edit in the talk page. I don't agree that it was "obviuos xenophobia", but that doesn't matter. This is an article about Fascist Italianization, which happened between 1922 and 1945. And Napolitano's words were not italianization. Who or what was threatened to be italianized? If you want, you can create an article called Italian Racism or Italian Revanchism, since these were the accusations by Mesic. 87.9.234.210 08:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Literature about
Here's some literature ˇZbornik radova s Međunarodnog znanstvenog skupa Talijanska uprava na hrvatskom prostoru i egzodus Hrvata (1918. - 1943.), Hrvatski institut za povijest : Društvo Egzodus istarskih Hrvata, Zagreb, 2001, ISBN 953-6324-17-2, ISBN 953-6321-17-2. The book is the monography of Croatian Institute for History/Society of exiled Istrian Croats, from International scientific meeting on the topic: Italian rule on area of Croatia and the exodus of Croats (1918-1943). Mihael Sobolevski: Egzodus Hrvata iz Rijeke u vrijeme D’Annunzijeve vladavine : (rujan 1919. - siječanj 1921.), magazine Rijeka, nr. 4/1998-99, p. 67-86 and nr. 8/2003, p.59-68. Magazine Rijeka ISSN 1330-6995. This should help. Kubura (talk) 13:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Here's more. . Pavao Parovel: Izbrisani identitet - Nasilno potalijančivanje prezimena, imena i toponima u "Julijskoj krajini", od 1919. do 1945., sa spiskovima iz Tršćanske, Goričke i Istarske pokrajine, te prvih 5.300 dekreta; Matica hrvatska Ogranak Pazin, Matica hrvatska Ogranak Poreč, Matica hrvatska Ogranak Pula, Pazin - Poreč - Pula, 1993. (Deleted identity - Violent Italianizing of suranmes, names and toponyms in Venezia Giulia 1919-1945, with list from provinces of Triest, Gorica and Istra and first 5300 decrees). Here's translated TOC: I. Peoples, surnames and toponymes of Adriatic areas violently annected to Italy after WWI Teritorial organization, Population, Historical forming, original ethnolinguistic composition of particular nations, Triest and surroundings, Gorica and province, Areas taken away from Carinthia and Carniola (Koruška and Kranjska), Istra and islands, Rijeka, Zadar II. Violent Italianization after 1918 Political basis, First official attitudes and parliamentary encouraging, Repression, Italianizing of toponyms, surnames and names, Ideolgy of Italianizing, Means and time, Toponyms, Surnames, Names, After WWII, How to regain "original surname" (Surname changed with decree, Surname deviated with erratic anagraphic transcription), How to regain original surname, Basis for returning of toponyms in original form III. List of Italianized surnames, names and toponyms Province of Triest, Province of Gorizia, Istra, Rijeka, islands, Names, Toponyms, First 5300 prefecture's decrees about Italianizing of surnames in Triest IV. Documents Basic bibliography Afterword by Milan Rakovac: Ethicality and historicality of identity There you have it. Kubura (talk) 12:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Explanation
From Talk:Italianisation: "Can anybody see who messed up with the history of article "fascist italianization"? It looks like it's much older article (from 7 Dec 05), although it was created much later (I must rely on my memory and on my previous messages ). Look the history of pages": - Italianization (so small article??) (1st edit on 5 oct 2007, move done by vandal Giove; his comment "moved Italianization to Fascist italianization: Better name") - Talk:Italianization (1st edit is move by banned vandal Giove on 5 Oct 2007???) - Fascist Italianization (1st edit  from 29 Dec 2004, mentions "Italization" as title) - Talk:Fascist Italianization (1st edit  from 7 Dec 2005, doesn't mention adjective "fascist") However, on 08:35, on 5 Oct 2007, article still started with "Italianization". 14 minutes later, banned user Giovanni Giove started his edit crusade 17 edits in 1 hour and 11 minutes)... ending with redirect and contentforking article "fascist Italianization". See the bottom. See this. This is the moment of creation of the article "fascist Italianization", on 8 Oct 2007, on 09:32, by banned vandal Giovanni Giove. 2 minutes later, the title of the text  is changed... by banned troll Giove. As we see, the creation of article "fascist Italianization" is ordinary content forking and, as we say in Croatian, razvodnjavanje (pouring too much water in order to milden the original content). Or someone wants to keep the legacy of proven troll alive? Kubura (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

My comment now: the article was started as "Italianization". Looking in history of articles, it's obvious that it was started as "Italianization", and not as "Fascist Italianization". See first ever from Dec 29 2004, 03:44. Although this link is from "Fascist Italianization", the original title is obvious from the text in the article. Here is the place, where that troll has messed the history of pages, creating a contentfork. Kubura (talk) 13:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Fascist Italianization article was an attempt to erase any mention of Italianization in Dalmatia and Istria before 20th century, so it would appear that this process was natural earlier. In fact Italianization was conducted already by the Venetians in the littoral cities when speaking about the noble society, Croatian and Dalmatian noblemen. Austrian government encouraged it in 19th century to keep Dalmatia away from the rest of Croatia, so it grasped some circles of the citizenship too.
 * This is not the only contentfork with this agenda in Wiki, but resolving this case is a good start. Zenanarh (talk) 13:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)