Talk:FastPictureViewer

Comment
This article is just an advertisement, the external links link just to the official site of the product and the program is not notable at all. The freeware version is merely a jpg-viewer. -- 212.7.189.15 (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

On the contrary, the program is very notable as it is the only freeware viewer in existence with proper color management, proper Unicode support, proper XMP support and DirectX / multicore processors support. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.0.135.84 (talk) 20:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

..but this is still written like an advertisement. Not correct Wikipedia tone. It's got ok info, but very marketing oriented. Obviously written by the company. Arcades (talk) 11:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FastPictureViewer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080406135050/http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1997/apr97/linopr.mspx to http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1997/Apr97/LinoPr.mspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604154632/http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/sep05/09-13VistaCanonPR.mspx to http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/sep05/09-13VistaCanonPR.mspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)