Talk:Fatbeard/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Notice of intent
I have decided to take on the task of reviewing this article. I'll have a quick-fail criteria review up shortly. Cordovao (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Quick-fail criteria review

 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources.  OK
 * 2) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way.  OK
 * 3) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.  OK
 * 4) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.  OK
 * 5) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.  OK


 * Conclusion: I have found that the article does not fall foul of the quick-fail criteria. Therefore, I will be moving onto a proper GA review later.  Cordovao (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article only contains eight references. While that is not a direct violation of the GA criteria, I'd like to see at least 10 references to be consistent with other South Park GAs, i.e. The Ring. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 05:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  12:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Removing Reviewer
'Since the reviewer seems to have disappeared and hasn't responded to multiple messages, I'm listing the article as no longer under review at WP:GAN. Whoever decides to review it in the future, perhaps you could just conduct your review below. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs ) ' 14:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

New GA review
Nice work on the article, it was really interesting to read. I will put it on hold for a week. Good luck! :)  The Le ft orium  15:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it really necessary to mention the UK airdate?
 * I think so, if it's available. Including one date and excluding the other would strike me as U.S.-centric. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * and was rated TV-MA L in the United States – Can you add "for strong to extreme language" to the end of the sentence?
 * Done. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The episode was a reference to the increasing international media attention to Somalian piracy (I think it's better like that, though I could be wrong)
 * I think it is better grammatically without it. I'm not a stickler for this though, if it will hold up the GAN, please feel free to add it in. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge the second and third paragraphs in the lead (the third one is too small).
 * Done. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you add another image to the article? It's a bit empty. (Suggestions: Trey Parker, Maersk Alabama hijacking, Piracy in Somalia, Blackbeard)
 * I actually added two. Is that OK? —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * who gave the episode an A- grade – Use  instead of a hyphen.
 * Done. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The publishers in refs 1, 7, 10, and 11 should not be in italics as they are websites and not magazines. (Use "publisher=" instead of "work=")
 * Done. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good so I will pass the article.  The Le ft orium  18:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)