Talk:Father Stretch My Hands/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BeatlesLedTV (talk · contribs) 22:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Responding to points now Kyle Peake (talk) 06:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I will be addressing everything you wrote now, could you respond to any questions by me please?

Lead and infoboxes

 * We talked a while ago about consistency. You don't have to say "Father Stretch My Hands, Pt. 1" every time.
 * Fixed
 * "was served to US" → was sent to US
 * Done
 * radio → radio stations
 * Done
 * "whilst vocals are included in "Pt. 2" from" → while "Pt. 2" contains vocals from
 * Done
 * Very minor but there's a space between the T & L in T. L. Barrett
 * Removed
 * "A sample of T.L. Barrett's track of the same title as the song is sampled in both parts of it." – this sentence doesn't really read well
 * Reworded
 * ""Father Stretch My Hands" was well received by music critics." → "Both parts of the song were well-received by music critics..."; wouldn't hurt to explain the highlights of both parts, like how Chance's verse was the highlight of "Ultralight Beam"
 * Added more in depth
 * If you can link any of the awards please do so
 * Done
 * "Award Winning" is 'Award Winning' part of the title? If not they shouldn't be capitalized.
 * Yes it is
 * Another question: Do you have recording dates? I imagine 2015–2016 but I think that should be noted.
 * Can't find sources for any, sorry about that.

Background

 * "meeting and he played" → meeting where he played
 * Done
 * The whole second sentence seems like a run-on and reads a little weird
 * What should I change about it now?
 * Second sentence now seems like a comma splice.
 * Split into two sentences.


 * "Shaw was initially not interested in collaborating with West, not doing anything for a week or two, until she dived deeply into West's album 808s & Heartbreak (2008) and went on to release a remix of the album's song "Say You Will" in October 2015." → While not initially interested in a collaboration, it wasn't until two weeks later when Shaw delved deeply into West's 2008 album 808s and Heartbreak that she agreed to a collaboration; Shaw went on to release a remix of the album's song "Say You Will" in October 2015.
 * Done
 * "Shaw's vocals on "Pt. 2" don't mark her only appearance on The Life of Pablo, since she also has vocals on fellow album track "Wolves".[3]" → Along with "Pt. 2", Shaw also recorded vocals for The Life of Pablo track "Wolves"
 * Done
 * "Two days after The Life of Pablo had been released" → Two days after the album's release"
 * Done

Composition and recording

 * Thoughts on having Desiigner's image side-by-side with Kid Cudi's?
 * Agreed
 * "featuring a sampled sound clip of Street Fighter II's announcer yelling 'PERFECT'," → "featuring a sampled sound clip of the announcer of the 1991 video game Street Fighter II yelling 'Perfect!'," (doesn't need to be in all caps as he doesn't really shout it)
 * Done
 * "A 'rough cut' of the song was first released online in February 2016.[11]" The album was released on February 14 so when in February? If it's 1–13 it should be noted, then said "____ days before the album's release."
 * Removed content as the source says nothing of a rough cut
 * Link soul to soul music
 * Done
 * The quote from GQ feels like the biggest run-on sentence and feels like their take on it. You can use them as a source, but I would rewrite it to sound more encyclopedic, especially since the entire paragraph is just one sentence.
 * Not sure what to rewrite it as?
 * How's this for an opening sentence: ""Father Stretch My Hands" is a hip hop song, with "Pt. 1" containing elements of gospel music, and "Pt. 2" containing elements of trap music."? What you can also do is split the GQ quote into separate areas of the section, or maybe make it into a quote?
 * Heavily reworded, how's this look now?


 * The sentence about Chance reads as though you already know about the song and gives no context into it. Find a reliable source that includes the lyrics of the whole bleached asshole line and say something like "In "Pt. 1", the song contains the lyrics... or West raps... (something like that) so that it leads into the sentence. Without it there's no context.
 * Done
 * Rhymefest → Hip hop artist Rhymefest
 * Done
 * Not sure if Genius is a reliable source
 * It is not considered unreliable for news, just for explaining lyrics of songs.
 * Why did Kendrick not appear? If unknown that should be noted (like Bieber with "Ultralight Beam")
 * What do you mean? Ultralight Beam does not state that it is unknown why Bieber didn't appear.
 * You're right I guess it doesn't. If there isn't a stated reason as to why Kendrick didn't appear then you can just leave it.


 * ""Pt. 1" is lyrically centered around models, and sequels directly into "Pt. 2", a soul-baring confessional dance track that starts with a sampled sound clip of the announcer of the 1991 video game Street Fighter II yelling 'Perfect!'" – need more about "Pt. 1". Sentence also isn't consistent as you talk about lyrics in "Pt. 1" but the sound of "Pt. 2". You already mention the sound of "Pt. 2" in the sentence before so discuss the lyrics here.
 * Added a sentence solely for "Pt. 1"

Release and reception

 * I added some additional info on the song's release before reception. Also mentioned it's single release, which will need a ref or two.
 * space between T & L
 * Done
 * "Sheldon Pearce of SPIN claimed that when West "tweeted that The Life of Pablo was a gospel album during one of his longer stream-of-consciousness fits [he can certainly] be taken literally" and Kyle McGovern of the site pointed out West's verse on "Pt. 2" in praise for being one of the album's "flashes of vintage [Kanye]".[17]" – this doesn't really flow together. Is there missing punctuation in the first quote because I had to reread that like 3 times? Kyle's review can also be his own sentence; these refs can be used more than once
 * Edited
 * Sometimes periods are outside quotes and sometimes they aren't
 * I don't really think this matters, as long as it shows what the critics meant.
 * I would keep it one or the another. Consistency is key.


 * "It was wrote by the staff" – written not wrote
 * Done
 * Have there been more people that have commented on the bleached asshole lines? It definitely is one of West's most divisive lyrics when determining good and bad.
 * Listed another opinion, fine now?
 * "The site listed "Pt. 1" as" → "The site also listed "Pt. 1" as"
 * Done

Potential music video

 * " for "Pt. 2" and one month" – again run-on; end with a period after "Pt. 2" and just start a new sentence with one
 * Done
 * "with the caption "2 times" included." included where? At the top? Bottom? In the background?
 * Added "on the monitor."
 * You spell out thirteen earlier and use numbers for 11 here. MOS:NUMS doesn't require numbers to be spelled out after nine but if you do make sure it's consistent throughout the article.
 * Changed to 13th and left this one as it is.
 * "was deleted in the day of it being posted." – reads weird; "was deleted within 24 hours of it being posted." that apply or was it less than 24?
 * Done

Live performances

 * "which served as a tribute to Cudi because he was in rehab at the time and HipHopDX shared a recording of the performance via Instagram.[30]" – again run-on; → "which served as a tribute to Cudi because he was in rehab at the time; HipHopDX later shared a recording of the performance on Instagram.[30]"
 * Done
 * Chance → Chance the Rapper (see the GA review for "Ultralight Beam" where I did the same thing and it was addressed)
 * Done
 * Has he ever performed "Pt. 2"? Or even then has Desiigner?
 * Added a source for its live debut, but West hasn't performed it as many times as "Pt. 1".

Commercial performance

 * "Prior to the two-part single being released," – "Prior to the single's release,"
 * Done
 * "The song did this on the Canadian Hot 100 as well," did what? – just say "The song did the same on the Canadian Hot 100,"
 * Done
 * You say " after the two-part single's release." quite a bit. Saying it once is fine.
 * Done
 * "the two-part single had been released." → the two-part single's release."
 * Done
 * "On top of this" – not really encyclopedic; saying "It was later certified 2x Platinum in the US on March 7, 2018."
 * Done

Legacy

 * Honestly in popular culture can be combined into this since it's also a part of the song's "legacy"
 * Done
 * Should Kim's opinion be in reception or here?
 * Legacy because it was expressed months after the song's release.
 * Is Metro Boomin's intro really a "meme"? I don't recall it being used in ways other internet memes are used, but I do recall that line being in dozens of other rap songs after. Meme should also be linked to internet meme
 * Yes, the source even says it's a meme.

Personnel

 * Good

Charts

 * Good
 * I changed my mind. Put them into columns so "Pt. 1" is on the left and "Pt. 2" is on the right.

Certifications

 * Good
 * Do the same thing as I said in 'charts'

Release history

 * Center ref col
 * Done

I'm gonna stop there for now since there's already a ton of work that the article could still use. I'll get to the other sections when everything else currently listed gets resolved. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Finished up for now. Might have some other things later. Still quite a ways to go. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Question. Was this song one of the song's West updated in March 2016? The most notable fix was "Wolves" and the addition of "Saint Pablo" but did this song change at all? BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have looked now and found out that updates were made to "Pt. 1" and "Pt. 2". Just on a note about this, XXL states in part of the "Pt. 2" update "Kanye's vocals become even smoother." Would writing in the article "The production of "Pt. 2" was tweaked and fine-tuned, with West's vocals become even smoother." read correctly or does 'even smoother' sound unencyclopedic? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * "Even smoother" definitely doesn't sound grammatically correct. You can just say "West's vocals sound smoother according to XXL" or something like that. I actually only heard the originally version of the album once and before I could again he updated it so making note of the changes is important. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Meant to put unencyclopedic, fixed the typo and I will find a way to reword it, maybe something like "becoming smoother" would be alright... also does my editing of the Desiigner content in the background section read fine? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Here's my main question. "Pt. 2" is built upon "Panda"'s beat; "Panda" was released in December 2015. When West played "Pt. 2" for Desiigner, did it already contain the "Panda" beat and Desiigner loved it or what exactly happened? BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The source doesn't state whether it contained the beat or not. It also doesn't say when he met West. Take a look at my rewording in composition and recording and give us feedback please. Kyle Peake (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The composition section should contain a full rundown of the song, from beginning to end. Also, part of Desiigner's verse is directly from "Panda", which should be mentioned. You can see what I wrote for "Ultralight Beam" to get a gist of what I mean. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have added in content about the updates, please tell me if there's any errors with it and I fixed the reception section for consistency. Honestly though, I can't break down the song as a rundown and where the samples are included exactly in it via sources able to be found. Isn't this content fine as it is? --Kyle Peake (talk) 23:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking like timestamp specific, just meaning a proper order. Like the 'Perfect!' clip appears right at the start of "Pt. 2", West performs his verse, then Desiigner. Things like that. Also, I made some lead expansions and am gonna make some additions and background on the changes. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 00:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have now managed to edit the article into a proper order, any improvements still required or not? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing is ever done being improved. I posted some more comments above and will see if anything else needs improving. I'm sure there is but we'll see. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about adding the col to commercial performance, I misread your feedback initially and have improved the other sections now. Anything else needed? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Made a comment up in the comp section. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Looked now and split sentences, is this adequate? --Kyle Peake (talk) 19:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks much better. Also, who is the "contemporary classical composer" that uses the vocoder? Is it Caroline Shaw or someone else? If it's Shaw just say it's her. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It is her, but should I write "meditative piece spoken on a vocoder by Caroline Shaw" or "meditative piece spoken on a vocoder by Shaw"? --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Just say Shaw since you already say her name earlier in the paragraph. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Any other improvements I should make or can this pass as a GA? --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It's definitely very close and looks so much better than the first time you nominated it. I'll do some final read-throughs, do any minor stuff myself, and if there's anything major I'll bring it up here. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. I will not be awake for too much longer as it is 22:43 in the UK timezone which I have gathered you don't inhabit, but I will respond to anything of importance tomorrow or later. --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah I live in the US. You'll obviously get a notification on whether I pass it or whether there's another issue. I'll most likely pass it. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * That's dope, I've got like another 10 minutes or so until sleep time so may witness it today! --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Satisfies the GA criteria. I will ✅ it. Great job on this! – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * That's awesome to hear, I'm glad to have been the lead contributor to two GA's now! Am I allowed to add this to the list of good articles and update the WikiProjects if it hasn't been done yet? --Kyle Peake (talk) 22:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Just did it so no need. A bot will put the icon at the top. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Congrats! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)