Talk:Fatimid invasion of Egypt (914–915)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 18:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * 1: I found several mistakes in the prose which were minor and I corrected them. However, please review the article carefully and correct any typos I might have missed. Gug01 (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for that. I can't find any major problems, but have tweaked things here and there.
 * Good job on this! Gug01 (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2: See the comment in the table about the Analysis and Aftermath sections. Gug01 (talk) 18:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I considered this, but it is more properly part of the analysis of the campaign, rather than "what happened after", or the political impact it had. Perhaps it might simply suffice to reverse the order of the two sections?
 * Yes, I think it should suffice. Gug01 (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * 3: Add more information about the revolt in Cyrenaica. Gug01 (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * On the rebellion in 915, there are not many details available in the primary sources. What little there is ha snow been included. I did add some info on the revolt of Tripolis in 912.
 * I got it. Gug01 (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Please incorporate the feedback into the article. Gug01 (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Gug01, thanks for taking the time. I will need a few more days, since I don't have access to Halm's book right now. Thanks, Constantine  ✍  08:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. I totally understand. I'll put the GA nomination on hold for 2 weeks, and will shorten/prolong it based on your finding the book. Don't feel too rushed. Gug01 (talk) 01:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi again Gug01, I think I have now addressed the points above. Anything else, even if not directly pertinent to the GA requirements? Any comments on readability/understandability? Cheers, Constantine  ✍  14:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Great job writing the article! There's really nothing left to address in my opinion. PS. Is there an article about the final conquest of Egypt? B/c the link is red and it doesn't lead anywhere. Gug01 (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Not yet, will be done soon, though; thanks again for taking the time and for your suggestions! Constantine  ✍  18:27, 20 January 2019 (UTC)