Talk:Favorite Girl/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments: I will put this Oh Hold for up to seven days, to allow for these issues to be addressed.
 * I'm wondering why there is nothing from a critical response perspective, and more information about the song itself. I feel that the article is too thin on content at this stage.
 * Image of covers need to be less than 300px to qualify for fair use.


 * Fixed image. But I have searched over and over for critical reception since November for the article. The article has techincally been finished for months, and since it was virtually nothing else, I decided to just go ahead and give a shot at GA. However I did find more information to add elsewhere. Candyo32 (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for fixing the image. I have checked before with other editors regarding content. Although I believe the article should have more content, their opinion was that it is acceptable. As such, I will pass it but please do try to improve it in future if possible. -- S Masters (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)